Search results

He has more than one. He has one that no man knows.

Okay. I'll let you claim victory. Have it your way. Stay ignorant.

I don't think you got that from your heart copy.....

Yeah. You're definitely preaching the KJV instead of Jesus.

God didn't send me to baptize but to preach His Son.

Quick.... What does 1 Ki 4:7 say? Don't use anything but your heart copy.....

No. Jesus saves. The KJV doesn't. It is a sad shame you give such honor to such ridiculous things.... INSTEAD of Jesus.

I never said I reject Acts 2:38. I don't.

Jerome studied many languages. He had to because of his position in the Catholic church. It was why he was.... where he was at. At every turn, you move when I give you the real answer. You can't defend a single thing you've claimed. Nada.

So your "heart copy" is perfect?

Yeah. That is at the top of the returns for a google search. I've read his junk before. He is one of those silly people that believe the LXX was a fabrication. Jerome used the LXX for the Vulgate. Do you deny this? Why would Jerome us the LXX if he believed the LXX was corrupt? Use your...

Provide the quote...... You can't. You're reading some nonsense somewhere on google..... Jerome found a single instance wherein he believed the Hebrew texts he had access to were superior to the LXX. He was wrong. Augustine basically begged Jerome to not do what he did. Jerome didn't have...

Yeah. KJVOist...... Why did you try to hide it earlier? The Geneva Bible was just revised with modern spellings...... Check it out. You really should study more.

I explained it to your several times now.... You are so unlearned on this topic... yet here you are..... claiming I'm a heretic over it. The MT is a emended, revised and reconstructed text. There are no Hebrew originals. The Torah was originally written in a dialect that is no longer available...

Your still promoting the KJV when the KJV robbed from the work of the Geneva translators.

I see you are into popularity contests.... except when it doesn't fit your narrative..... The only bible in that top 10 I would recommend is the ESV with the understanding you need a TR for the synoptic Gospels. Just like Alexandirnus.

I know them better than you do. Sinaiticus is of dubious origins. Vaticanus lack all the works of the Maccabees. Which means that it is missing the festival of lights..... You should really not believe everything you Google.

See. You are a KJVOist. You're just lying about it. Anyone that knows the Geneva.... knows it is better than the KJV. Much better. Why did the KJV plagiarize the Geneva Bible? Do you support plagiarism?

Nope. Your mistake as usual.

You don't know anything about them. Alexandrinus is the premier source.