Search results

All men have their own agendas. You're using very poor sources in your defense. Zondervan is a joke. The story of the DSS have changed dramatically over the years. The DSS witness to at least three streams of texts. We know the MT is a reconstructed text from the enemies of God. Those that...

Why are you not dealing with the verse I referenced? I know why. You're moving the goalpost. I am a student of the manuscripts and languages of the Holy Scriptures. There are only a few references in the NT that are not taken from the LXX. You found one from Google and your mistake is trusting...

I knew what you meant. Just poking you so you will always remember...... :)

You think someone that has been all over the world teaching/preaching theology would stop saying...... "Armenian" in reference to "Arminianism". Armenia is a country

I post because this is a open discussion forum. Why you post here? I know you're not my wife. Talking about "stating the obvious"....

That is your mistake. It is unmistakable. We have Codex Alexandrinus. We know that the NT authors referenced the Greek OT. We know because we have the texts to prove it. I could spends days proving it over and over again but I'll give you a single proof. Prove me wrong... Act 8:32 The place of...

Just a question.

Why don't understand that Jesus came from Latin? You need to be educated yourself. Stop listening to silly KJVOists. No one needs to understand concupiscence. It doesn't belong in any English translation.

No. It does not. Jesus is a Latinized name. I have no problem with the name of Jesus. However, you can't ignore facts. There are many Latin renderings in the KJV due to the influence of the Douay–Rheims Bible

Like I said "concupiscence" is a doctrine. When you put "concupiscence" into any translation, you are injecting doctrine. Not translating. Concupiscence comes from Latin. From the Vulgate. You have no idea what you're talking about.

Nonsense. Jesus isn't in Hebrews 4. Ruler isn't found in Hebrews 13. These two mistakes along greatly impact what is taught to others. Sure the Spirit of God does. However, you don't listen. Bob doesn't listen. I don't listen. We all have the issue. Saying the Spirit overrides our rebellious...

a. Glad you agree. Bob doesn't. b. I don't believe you. Prove it. c. Charismatics are always present themselves as superior Christians. You tell others that they should be just like you. You are wrong.

Telling others where the KJV is wrong. Have you not noticed? Bob you're a charismatic that pretends they can speak the tongues of angels. You are mistaken. Your belief makes you believe you are something that you are not. You believe you are gifted ABOVE your fellowman. Bob. We BOTH has...

Same ole "Bob".... Bob doesn't believe mistakes should be dealt with. He very wrongly says that all "Bibles" say the same thing and that the "Holy Spirit" can correct an issue even if you believe a lie your "Bible" tells you... Every thing Bob says is a "walking" contradiction. Bob is...

Yeah. Get a 1828 webster dictionary and "Win the world"..... You would rather believe a lie than to force man to deal with their own sinfulness. You refuse to deal with your own sin and yet you expect to win others...... Yeah. KJOism at its "finest"....

He denies the Trinity. He is "oneness". Both of you are made for each others..... Again. At least he knows the difference when it comes to what you claim. He loves his lies too.

You're not "thinking" at all.

Realize what Truther is saying..... He is basically saying.... "I must lie to people or they will not accept what I say...." Which is so sad. It is exactly what happens with most any cult today. Lies sold as the Truth with the excuse that "the ends justify the means"....

It isn't. I tell them exactly what is right and what is wrong. You just lie to them. Sad.

That is a lie. You're thinking of a different Codex and you don't even know it....... You're just proving you don't know much of anything about the subject. Get Avery to help you. At least he knows the difference.