Search results

So can you read and understand? Who is "THEY" in the passage? 1. THEY are blinded in part 2. THEY are a remnant by definition hence, THEY includes the saved Israel and the not saved Israel. or in other words ALL ISRAEL so when you see the word THEY, You include not only the remnant of saved...

yes. as far as the land promise goes, But he is "Abraham" so to curse him would be to curse Abraham

since Christ is God. Then you said what I claimed you said.. not sure why you would deny it Yes. Because he saved us, and out of gratitude and love. and the fact he made us new creatures and adopted us as his own children. we obey him No I did not You said we are not saved by human effort...

wow this thread God dark fast.. I am surprised it is still open.

no you are He said they are enemies concerning the gospel so everyone agrees. they reject Christ (the ones who are blinded) and they attack the gospel. But God has kept a remnant.. You only keep a remnant when you plan on keeping that bloodline in tact. God made a gift to them in Gen 15 to...

again there is a clause, It was made to protect any church or religion from taking power and forcing the whole nation to bow to that power.

I think of all the atrocities in the passed done by christian crussaders and catholics in the name of Christ. Many against muslims. and alot of these are the cause of the retaliation against christians today. Not just from mulsims

let he who has no sin cast the first stone.

so they are stronger than God?

someone has scofield derangement syndrome (SDS)

gen 12. just remember, Gen 3 was written to all the kids of Abraham, Not just Isaac. this would also include Ishmael, he had many other children's from other wives too.. they all would be included not just Israel

amen they can scream against scofield all the want, the fact is literal interpretation of prophecy proves them wrong., not scofield

actually no they were not.. they were always blinded in part. the OT promises still stand. Paul makes it clear. they may be our enemies concerning the gospel.. but they are to be beloved because of the promises''the gifts and calling of God are irevokable.. God does not go back on his promises

sadly, I can not remember the town in michigan. But there is one there that enforces sharia law. and the liberal state government has not done anythign to stop it..

this would violate the separation clause

seperation of church and state would apply the law was made so that no religious organization can rule a city, state or the nation. from what I understand, it would by why the state could keep it out of the government

even if we are faithless, he is faithfull. He can not deny himself

I am saying this sincerely do you not see the contradictions in the above two statements as I have separated 1st you say it is all of God with no human effort 2nd you say it is all of human effort.. how can it be both ways

I believe he is gone..

how can you lose something you could never earn? and how is it glory to God if he made a mistake?