Search results

How about you actually address what I said in my post first before asking questions? You are being very evasive. How do you reconcile your view with John 5:28-29?

Weak response! You are not even willing to explain exactly what you were intending to say and how you came to your conclusion. A sure sign of false teaching.

Why would you believe that people can fall away after being resurrected, but not be saved? That's completely ridiculous nonsense. Excuse me for not fully understanding your ludicrous beliefs.

I don't care what's in your flawed mind. You just don't get it. As Amils understand Satan's binding (which you don't understand at all), he can deceive the nations no more during the thousand years and not again until he is loosed when the thousand years are over. I already have done that...

I was showing how ridiculous it is for you to talk about believing what the text says as if everything is just spelled out for us and no spiritual discernment is required.

Where does any of that say that some of the lost are resurrected one time and then the rest another time 1,000+ years apart? Nowhere. You are the one adding to scripture. How about you show me exactly where you think it says that? Be specific. I don't see that in those verses at all, so show me...

Because today is the day and now is the time of salvation, not tomorrow or after we die. 2 Corinthians 6:1 As God’s co-workers we urge you not to receive God’s grace in vain. 2 For he says, ”In the time of my favor I heard you, and in the day of salvation I helped you.” I tell you, now is the...

I thought you used common sense when interpreting scripture? There is no common sense in believing that some of the lost will be resurrected 1,000+ years after the rest of the lost. That is not taught anywhere in scripture. Jesus certainly did not teach that. John 5:28 Marvel not at this: for...

LOL. So, we should be looking out for a literal beast with seven literal heads and ten literal horns? I mean, that's what the text says. You apparently think that if we don't take something as literally as possible then we are adding to the scripture. To be consistent this means you should...

David, I've told you this a few times before but you never "listen". Amils do not deny what it means when it says "no more". We believe that Satan can deceive the nations no more during the thousand years. The difference between how Amils interpret Revelation 20 and how Premils interpret it has...

Why do you have to say stupid things like "Why can't Amils use at least use some common sense before concluding how something should be interpreted?". Your "common sense" is what Paul calls "man's wisdom", which "the natural man" relies on and causes him to see God's word and the things of the...

LOL. I see that you are making about the same amount of headway with him as I have (none), so does that mean you are not making your point as effectively as could be or is it just impossible to get him to understand how we Amils understand Satan's binding and what it means for him to deceive the...

Well, it doesn't feel very good when that happens, does it? LOL. You are pretending as if you know what I believe more than I do, which is a complete joke. No, you do not. This is a huge waste of time. Just believe whatever you want, but please stop acting as if you understand what I believe...

I am suggesting no such thing. Not at all. You proved once again that you do not understand my view. Just accept that and stop trying to speak for me. You just end up misrepresenting what I believe over and over again. You, in contrast, seem to act as if Satan having the power of death meant...

It's not talking about an ongoing gathering, it's talking about the elect being gathered when Jesus comes, just like Paul wrote about in 1 Thesslonians 4:14-17.. You try to twist the text to fit your false preterist doctrine. You have some gall trying to tell other people they are using bad...

I'm done with this. Your claims of bad exegesis on my part are ludicrous. Your exegesis is HORRIBLE because you do not take ALL of scripture into account when interpreting the Olivet Discourse, which is very unwise on your part. That question has nothing to do with my point. I was simply...

You're not reading what I'm saying carefully at all. I'm saying that is what binds Satan. The preaching of the gospel of Christ and His death and resurrection through the power of the Holy Spirit is what keeps Satan from preventing the word of God to be preached throughout the world as he was...

The Luke 21 passage has heaven and earth passing away when Jesus returns, just like 2 Peter 3:10-12. So, that clearly supports Amil. Neither the Isaiah 24 passage nor the Revelation 19 passage say anything about any mortals surviving His return. Where does verse 22 say anything about mortal...

I'm mocking your ridiculous interpretation of the Bible. I will not delete it. The image of the beast is the opposite of the image of Christ. We (His people) are conformed to the image of Christ. Romans 8:29 For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son...

Sure. And you acknowledge that you're not talking about the abomination of desolation being set up on the temple mount of the dome of the rock, but rather of a temple that does not currently exist, yes?