Search results

What are we playing, scripture tag? You don't think you need to address what He said in Matthew 24:42-44 where He told believers that they do not know the day or hour, but need to be ready for it? Do you accept what He said there or not? Those who are not watching will experience His wrath...

Of course you don't. So, what do you call it then when you won't address part of a passage? You do agree that the following verses refer to the same event as verses 21 and 22, right? Isaiah 24:19 The earth is utterly broken down, the earth is clean dissolved, the earth is moved exceedingly...

It's very ironic for a madman like you to accuse the Amill doctrine of being "a theory of a madman". Foolish madmen like you try to accuse Amills of supposedly making literal texts symbolic. Amillennialism is founded on literal scripture, so these accusations are foolish and inappropriate...

Yes, I see that a post of yours from about 4 years ago was replied to for some reason. But, in that post you said "There will be a literal thousand year reign of Christ on earth.". I'm trying to show you that is not true because it contradicts passages like 2 Peter 3:10-12. I'm an Amillennialist.

Yep. So, as long as our frameworks differ, we will never agree on this. So, what's the point of continuing to discuss it then? There is none. You are comparing a gathering by angels to human servants preaching the gospel. It's an invalid comparison. Matthew 24:29-31 is the same event as 1...

Jesus did not say that we would ever know the hour of His coming until He actually comes. Here is Jesus talking to believers: Matthew 24:42 Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come. 43 But know this, that if the goodman of the house had known in what watch the thief would...

Zechariah 14 is an undeniably difficult passage to interpret. You are not able to explain several things that are written about in the passage, so what do you think you're proving here? Do you not have any clear, straightforward scripture at all to support your doctrine? If so, where is it? Why...

I'm not playing "gotcha" games here. The new heaven and new earth will not have any mortals on it and will be ushered in after the thousand years, so how does this answer my question about who the mortals would be that would supposedly populate the earth for a thousand years after Jesus returns?

Let's see if you really go by what scripture plainly states or not. Who are the mortals that you think will populate the earth after Jesus returns? Can you explain how any mortals can survive this... 2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the...

How convenient for you to ignore that verse 22 is also referring to the kings of the earth and not just "the host of the high ones that are on high". And how convenient for you to ignore verses 19 and 20 as well. Everyone can see how you just cherry pick scripture to form your doctrine.

I don't know. I'm not sure why I ever bother responding to him since he always just disappears after making his drive by posts and then never responds to us after we respond to his posts. He thinks we should address his points, but then he doesn't ever address ours. He will never address your...

Exactly. Premils can't understand this concept, though. It's just all or nothing with them. To them, Satan can either deceive everyone or no one. They don't understand how scripture makes general statements about things sometimes such as Paul saying that before Christ the Gentiles had "no hope"...

Where does Revelation 20:6 say something about eternal life? How about you apply what it says in Revelation 1:5-6 about Jesus reigning now and His followers being priests now to Revelation 20:6? How about you explain how those who are alive and remain will avoid the second death since they will...

I don't beliee that. Where are you getting that from? Like many on this forum, you have poor reading comprehension skills. So, tell me why oyou htink people can fall away after being resurrected if people can't be savd after being resurrected? Why would that be the case? It doesn't really...

You use so many words to say nothing. No, I cannot hear false doctrine and I'm glad about that. You do not know what you are talking about. That is clear to me. You do not even consider what effect Christ taking the power of death away from Satan had. Scripture says he was able to wield that...

I do agree with you about this. The fig tree does not represent anything in particular there. Jesus was simply saying that just as you know summer is near when a fig tree's leaves start coming out, you know His coming is near when you see "all these things" happening. There's no reason to read...

You are boring. You go beyond basic grammar rules and create your own. Deny it if you want, but you do. There was no gathering of any elect by angels in 70 AD. That is talking about the gathering of the church (church = the elect) at Christ's future second coming. The dead in Christ will be...

You are the one not willing to show exactly how you are coming to your conclusions, not me. I agree. Take your time in coming back. Wrong. Blah blah blah. Again, take your time in coming back. Maybe when you come back you will actually share something meaningful and worthwhile instead of all...

LOL. I didn't deliberately misunderstand anything. Your beliefs are confusing and ridiculous. Don't blame me that they are hard to follow. It's absolutely ludicrous to think that people can be saved after being resurrected or that they can fall away after being resurrected. As I said, and you...

That's not what I'm saying and you know it! I have said many times that he kept the vast majority of the world in spiritual darkness with few exceptions. I have said that about the Gentiles in particular because I have pointed out many times how Paul said that in Old Testament times the Gentiles...