Search results

Don't just post scripture without telling us where you are seeing two harvests (grain harvest and fruit harvest) there. Exegete the text and show us how exactly you are concluding that those texts teach two harvests. Anyone can just post scripture and make claims about it. That is not enough...

You blatantly contradict what Paul taught. He very clearly indicated that the mass falling away from the faith and revealing of the man of sin must happen first before our gathering to Christ at His second coming. 2 Thessalonians 2:1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus...

Yet another straw man argument from a Premill who does not understand what we believe. Notice how they focus on 1 Peter 5:8 and completely ignore 1 Peter 5:9. They focus on the power that Satan has and ignore the power that was taken away from him by Jesus and ignore that we have authority over him.

What are you intending to say here? Do you think Amils disagree with this verse? We don't. Do you even understand what we believe? If you did, you wouldn't try to use this verse to refute it. And, why do you focus on 1 Peter 5:8 and not verse 9? He seeks "whom he may devour", but he can't...

How about you explain why you think Satan is more powerful and influential than Jesus in all His glory? You think that in a short time Satan will be able to completely ruin everything that Jesus does for a thousand years while on the earth in all of His glory. Why would billions rebel against...

Their theories get more and more ridiculous because of their desperation to find something that can support their weak doctrine. They clearly can't address any of our points or answer any of our questions. Any time they try to address something, they just make straw man arguments that address a...

Premills have no point. Look at their arguments. Nothing more than a complete joke. They make things up to support Premill and misrepresent Amill repeatedly. It seems impossible to get them to actually address our points and answer our questions. We see that over and over again.

No one is saying that those described in verse 8 are the rest of the dead, so why are you once again wasting your time making a straw man argument? It seems that straw man arguments are the only type of arguments you ever make. LOL. You speak nothing but nonsense. To try to claim that Amills...

You understand that Amills believe that what is described in Revelation 20 occurs BEFORE what is described in Revelation 21, don't you? Or are you yet another Premill who has no idea what Amills actually believe?

Thanks for sharing your meaningless opinion. In case you can't tell, I've become bored with you and have already said everything I wanted to say about this topic. You can continue talking about your grammatical and contextual nosense if you want, but I'm not interested. Jesus did not return in...

Hello? Are you just ignoring where it says "the days of our years are threescore years and ten"? That's talking about the average human life span. It is generally 70 years, but could be up to 80 years "if our strength endures". Psalm 90:10 (NIV) Our days may come to seventy years, or eighty, if...

Other translations, such as the NKJV, have "tribulation" there instead of affliction. And the parallel verse of Matthew 24:21 says "great tribulation". So, what is your point in trying to deny that Jesus talked about great tribulation in that verse? You are the one complicating things. Why are...

You are the one trying to create a new definition for the word "generation" that does not exist. Show me any English dictionary where a definition for that word is the average human life span. Show me any Greek dictionary which shows a definition of the word "genea" is the average human life...

Says the guy who has never made a coherent argument in his life.

They do. The word "generation" in Matthew 24:34 is translated from the Greek word "genea". You know that the New Testament was written in Greek, don't you? None of the definitions for the word "genea" are the average human life span. There is nothing hard to understand about this.

You have failed to provide any scriptural evidence that Adam's age has anything to do with a supposed future earthly millennial kingdom. You have no clear scripture to support your doctrine.

Of course you don't think that. But, I don't care that you don't think that. In the Olivet Discourse Jesus said that when He comes He will destroy all unbelievers just like all unbelievers were destroyed in the flood and heaven and earth will pass away when that happens. And He said no one...

Thanks for sharing your wrong opinion on what "all these things" means. I appreciate you taking the time. Jesus did not return in 70 AD and the elect were not gathered in 70 AD. You cannot get around that. Both. Can you not see that He said the invitation goes out to the highways, representing...

I've already done that many times and you ignore it every time. Since nothing I've shown you before has convinced you, maybe this will convince you... Genesis 5:27 Altogether, Methuselah lived a total of 969 years, and then he died. Mehuselah lived almost 1,000 years, but not literally 1,000...

Ugh. People make things way more complicated than they are. Anyway, I'm still not seeing why it matters whether Mark 13:19 says "affliction" or "great tribulation", especially when the parallel verse of Matthew 24:21 always says "great tribulation". It seems like instead of saying that Mark...