Search results

It is near impossible to get you to address the Word of God. That is because the Book is the enemy of your doctrine. Matthew 12:22-29 records, “Then was brought unto him one possessed with a devil, blind, and dumb: and he healed him, insomuch that the blind and dumb both spake and saw. And all...

You cannot give straight answers. If you were to say it the way it is it would forbid your doctrine.

Again, totally avoidance of the biblical issues, and a desire to divert into irrelevancies.

Address what I wrote instead of diverting. And less of the intellectual dishonesty nonsense that you often hurl. You're the last person I'm going to take lectures on that subject from.

What is the first resurrection?

I think you think that if you state an opinion enough times that makes it a fact. Well, that is not the way it works. Scripture refutes your error. It forbids your doctrine. Salvation is a gift from God emanating out of His heart of grace. The Oxford Dictionary defines a gift as: "a thing...

That is simply not true! The opposite is the reality. Matthew 12:22-29 records, “Then was brought unto him one possessed with a devil, blind, and dumb: and he healed him, insomuch that the blind and dumb both spake and saw. And all the people were amazed, and said, Is not this the son of David...

LOL. More evasive noise. That is your MO. You like to present your long posts. But when they are challenged by detailed rebuttals you have no answers. The reader can see that in your threads. All you have is silly LOL emojis. Firstly, repeated Scripture uses binding in a figurative sense. The...

It is crystal clear by your avoidance that you have no answer to simple questions that challenge your position. I will continue to present more so the reader can see how bereft your position is of sense and biblical support. How many ends of the world do you want? How can there be another age...

This is all religious noise. You have zero corroboration to cover every single main tenet of Premil. Where else in Scripture is a thousand years mentioned after the second coming? Where in Scripture (including Rev 20) is Jesus shown to be on a millennial earth? Where else in Scripture is the...

You have refuted nothing. All we have are your opinions - zero biblical support. This is all religious noise. You have zero corroboration to cover every single main tenet of Premil. Where else in Scripture is a thousand years mentioned after the second coming? Where in Scripture (including Rev...

Do you believe in corroboration? Do you believe in supporting Scripture with Scripture?

There are multiple detailed posts above that refute this that you have carefully avoided. The reader can check that out for themselves.

And have you observed the nastiness of this guy?

Exactly bro. It is a man-made Jesuit invention.

It is called duplicity.

Jesus confirms, “the day that Noe entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all” (Luke 17:27).

You will note: his evidence is his opinions. That is it. He thinks if he states an opinion, that makes it a fact. He is building is argument on sand.

This is all religious noise. You have zero corroboration to cover every single main tenet of Premil. Where else in Scripture is a thousand years mentioned after the second coming? Where in Scripture (including Rev 20) is Jesus shown to be on a millennial earth? Where else in Scripture is the...

Talk about adding unto Scripture. You add 1000 years to text after text in order to let Premil fit. Well, this is forbidden in Scripture. Sorry to burst your bubble, when Jesus comes it is the end.