Search results

Yes, "his written word" is finished. That is, except for the parts that were "sealed" and "restrained", and only to be finished with "the mystery of God as He declared to His servants the prophets" before the sounding of the seventh angel.

My intention in expressing the difference between the spoken and written word, and the spiritual word (both being from God), is that we take care not to set a limit on God and attribute the greatest communication from God as being scripture or language--which He has confused (evidenced by our...

Another way to put it, is: The spoken or written word is to mankind (flesh and blood), as the spirit is to God.

What the world experiences is not revenge from God, but Judgement, Justice, Grace and Blessing.

No, sorry for the misunderstanding. The Bible (scripture) is true. It is just not the finished work of God. The natural comes first and then the spiritual. Which is to say, the spoken and written words of scripture is to the natural and this world, while the spirit is to God and the kingdom...

In a word--yes! God confused "all language" a the Tower of Babel, even "all" of scripture. Meaning, that even the scriptures are not the end-all source of truth. Which is why we debate and interpret it all in so many ways. Please allow me to explain: One word under confusion does not explain...

If you maintain your insistence that [confused] language, whether spoken or written, is the final say--you will remain in confusion. One word under confusion does not explain another under confusion. That process is no more profitable than the flesh. Do you understand that those are the terms...

Language is confused--not the end all of interpretation. But even in the language of the scriptures--if they are all reconciled--Jesus is God according to John yes, but also prophesied by name by Isaiah: Isa 9:6 For unto us a child H3206 is born, H3205 unto us a son H1121 is given: H5414 and...

TWO THINGS HERE ARE IN PLAY: 1. The bloodline of Israel is not the problem. They are a people who were not a people, whom God has made a light unto all nations and people. For which God has made certain promises and provisions, including many trials and a blindness after the "finish" like unto...

"Rothschilds." If more Christians only knew. Revelations are coming.

No, but you will see. It is enough.

Again, you reject that there is "A time for every purpose under heaven." And your purpose--as it is written, is greatly flawed. How is it that you do not know that during those days Christ had "somewhat against" 5 out of 7 churches; and that as "there were also false prophets among the people...

That sounds nice, but you have rejected the word of God which does not say that the best of Christian service was according to those of the 1st century, but that there is "A time for every purpose under heaven." So be it. So shall it be written of you.

Yes, kinda like "unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you", and "you must be born again." In which case you would do well to consider the error of the Priests and the Pharisees, and their ideas on what was literal and straightforward.

Oh how you sound like Nicodemus! Actually, worse by far.

If you do not follow into the cloud and kingdom, but remain as if in those early days, you remain in a time who's service is finished, except for the dying. If you were serving now, you would be pressing on with expectation, speaking the words of the promises that were to come.

Yes, it is obvious that you do not see the point. You go back to spiritual Egypt...which, no, is not serving God. Messiah gave the timeline by which to serve, saying "Behold, I cast out demons and perform cures today and tomorrow, and the third day I shall be perfected." Where do you think...

Not to answer for bdavidc, but you ask too much and claim too much, because you do not understand. You are approaching the issue with the logic of men. God is more, but you have set your own perceived limit, which is not true, nor good for you to do. Our first and natural perspective is to do...

Unfortunately, you're missing the point: God did not make any of us [to serve] for another time...but for a time such as "this."

What Paul was saying, instructing, was that those of that time should not get ahead of themselves. Which, again, would mean not being faithful to the time and purpose appointed by God to all in their own time. Meaning, that to get ahead or behind (as you have apparently chose to do), is to be...