Search results

Correct. But, Peter indicated that they will be ushered in as a direct fulfillment of the promise of Christ's second coming (2 Peter 3:13), so that places the timing of His second coming after the thousand years. Peter indicates that the heavens and earth will be burned up unexpectedly when...

No. That is completely unnecessary. The Bible has no charts and does not need to be explained with charts. Here is what the 70 week prophecy is all about: Daniel 9:24 Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins...

John said Jesus made us (the church) kings and priests (Rev 1:5-6) and Peter said we (the church) are "a royal priesthood" (1 Peter 2:9). You are not accepting what scripture teaches, which I noticed about you before when we have talked. I don't think you interpret even one single verse of...

Nope. He is writing about the church there. 1 Peter 2:5 Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ. 6 Wherefore also it is contained in the scripture, Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner...

The destruction Peter and Paul describe occur immediately when the day of the Lord's coming arrives unexpectedly and not 1,000+ years later. Despite that destruction, Peter says we look forward to the new heavens and new earth, so God is going to renew the heavens and earth by fire when Jesus...

Again, Jesus said the hour is coming when all of the dead will be raised (John 5:28-29), not the hours are coming when all of the dead will be raised. You have to change the text to make it fit your doctrine.

I agree. Good job of using scripture to interpret scripture. Another way that I show that the new heavens and new earth are ushered in at the return of Christ is like this. 2 Peter 3:3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, 4 And...

The next coherent argument he makes will be the first one he has ever made. It's pointless trying to reason with someone like him who gets his doctrine from his imagination and not from scripture.

It's not saying we won't reign until the future, It's saying we reign now and will continue to reign because it says He "HAST MADE us unto our God kings and priests". It clearly says we have been MADE kings and priests, so why would we not be reigning now? It's saying we reign now as kings and...

So, do you think the following passage is fulfilled "after the kingdom" when the new heaven and new earth are created, also? Paul is writing about the same day of the Lord event that Peter wrote about in 2 Peter 3:10-12 here... 1 Thessalonians 5:2 For yourselves know perfectly that the day of...

It says the hour (singular) is coming when all of the dead will be raised. It does not say the hours (plural) are coming.

Completely agree. As I see it, the Premil argument of most Premils hinges completely on the belief that Zechariah 14 relates to the return of Christ and on the assumption that what is described in Revelation 20 occurs after what is described in Revelation 19 chronologically. That's all they...

Haha. Who is the one who needs to relax? It's not me. You did...buddy. I didn't say that it isn't our first priority, so YOU get a grip. You read something into my post that I was NOT saying at all. Get off your high horse. I am 100% relaxed while telling you that you are a completely...

That proves nothing in relation to the coming of the Messiah. It does not say "unto the coming of the Messiah in Jerusalem". It does not say how long after 69 weeks He would be cut off.

I didn't say otherwise. I'm just pointing out that it can be used figuratively since you seemed to indicate that wasn't even possible. You ask loaded questions. Did you look up what Amillennialists believe like I asked you to do? Don't make me do all the work for you. Anyway, there are many of...

I am completely relaxed. You don't know me at all. You decided to be a jerk and misrepresent what I was saying and you won't admit it. I clarified what I believe which is that loving God does come first and you can't accept that. You have to harp on what you falsely perceived me to be saying in...

I was originally told that by PS95 who knows a lot about what they believe. It's also on their website. The following is an excerpt from this page on their official website: https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1985882?q=Rom+6%3A7&p=par 4. Why is fallen mankind heavily indebted to God, and why...

You didn't bother addressing what I said in my post about other uses of the term "thousand" in scripture. Your interpretation of Revelation 20 contradicts many other scriptures. But, you don't care enough to make the effort to study all of scripture to see what it teaches. You'd rather just...

The prophecy doesn't say there would be 69 weeks "unto the Messiah the Prince appearing in Jerusalem". It's referring to when Jesus would first be revealed as the Messiah which was when John the Baptist announced it with His baptism. John 1:29 The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and...

The prophecy doesn't say there would be 69 weeks "unto the Messiah the Prince appearing in Jerusalem". It's referring to when Jesus would first be revealed as the Messiah which was when John the Baptist announced it with His baptism. John 1:29 The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and...