Search results

Much of the Roman Catholic doctrine was assimilated into Protestantism and is still being passed along as Christian groups continue to split off from one another. In a nutshell that is why even the independent church in your neighborhood today most probably believes that there is a trinity, dead...

You must be brilliant because you understand it's either water or the spirit and we can't have both.

This Matthew 28:19-20 sounds an awful lot like 1 John 5:7-8 where it says For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three...

Where did I ever challenge John's qualifies as a prophet? Where? God told him Jesus was the Christ. That's all he needed to know to know Jesus was the Christ.

Where is the word water mentioned. Can you point to it... Then Peter said to them repent and be baptized by the Holy Ghost and you shall receive the Holy Ghost?

Water is not mentioned in verse 48. How is it you cannot see that?

John 3:5 is not the New Testament. God did not put a paper between Malachi and Matthew that said New Testament. Men did that... probably Catholics. P.S. The water in John 3:5 is referring to our first birth since our bodies are 90 something percent water.

Water baptism is a carryover from part of the Levitical Law. There are many examples of people in the Old Testament who would wash themselves with water as a final step to being clean. Water baptism was an outward sign of washing, and then you would be clean to God. Baptism in water, and the...

The first red flag should have been that the Catholics teach water baptism.

Peter did not command them to be baptized in water. He only asked about water in the verse before. Also these are little examples you quote even after I said because of tradition some were baptized with water in the beginning or were still asking questions about water which is what Peter did...

You must be Catholic. There is no water mentioned in Acts chapter two.

We are talking about Old Testament Prophets that were called Seers. Thus, I did not think I had to mention it. But I do see your point. May I have a verse that says John the baptize foretold?

Name one thing John the baptize foretold.

The Scripture does not say they baptized with water. Verse 47 says Peter asked about water. Verse 48 does not say they baptized with water. So they must have said no to Peter's question. Also these are little examples you quote even after I said because of tradition some were baptized with water...

Revelation is probably only about Israel and Christians are in the book morning, noon, and night thinking it has something to do with them.

John did not foretell or see in the future. God told him Jesus was the Christ. That's all John needed to know to know that it would be the Christ who would take away the sins. My opening statement was written about the Old Testament prophets and not the Christians. There were no Ephesians 4:11...

You are mixing apples and oranges. Gift ministries are not the same as the manifestations of the spirit.

Matthew 28:19 does not mention water and they must of said no in Acts 10:47 because they did not baptize with water there either.

We do not agree. I believe water baptism is taught in our churches today because it's a carryover from the Catholics who have never been right about anything.

Galatians 5:1-4 Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is...