Search results

Agreed. But what we were specifically talking about is. <smile> But... we can agree to disagree on that, too. <smile> I never said I knew you. But I can tell some things about you. Okay, well, so am I. Nothing wrong with that, of course. But you seem to be ~ or get ~ mad at anybody who...

But you're still replying, so I think here, SI, maaaaaaaaaybe, just maybe, you're lying. <smile> I never said I think I know you, SI, or that I know you. But I can discern some things about you from what you say and how you say it, and I'm sure the same is true for you regarding me. But hey...

Nobody is changing any terms. In this case, either can be used, but one is more accurately descriptive than the other. As I said. I care not if you care or not. <smile> Yes you are. It kinda drips from every one of your posts. You know, figuratively speaking. <smile> No, that would be...

Hmmmm. Interesting. Well... Hebrews 1:1-2 says, "Long ago, at many times and in many ways, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets, but in these last days He has spoken to us by His Son, whom He appointed the Heir of all things, through Whom also He created the world." Yes, it says, "in...

Good Lord. <eye roll> Nobody's changing terms. The term amillennial is really kind of a misnomer, for the reason I noted; there is a millennium, of course, but because of the 'a' prefix, the implication is really that there is not a millennium, which is not the case at all, and those who we...

Nope. See my reply to SI above. Time will still be a construct in the New Heaven and New Earth. God is outside of time (the potentate of time, as I said above, quoting the great hymn); time is part of His creation. That's certainly not "amills"... (nunc-mills). <smile> Grace and peace to you.

Well of course not... It would be, yes. <smile> I mean, it would have to be called something other than "eternity," for one thing... LOL! Grace and peace to you, David.

Well now I, as an "amill" ~ again, I think the correct term is nunc-mill, the 'nunc' prefix indicating we are in the midst of the present "millennium" ~ would disagree with what you say here, SI. God is redeeming creation, of which time is a part. God is outside of time... the potentate of...

<eye roll> Yes, I'm well aware of this. Good. I'm aware of that, too. <smile> Right. Post-tribulationism, in and of itself, is good. Yes, Christ will return after the tribulation; we agree on that. However, you are also a pre-millennialist, and as such, you believe that after this period...

You absolutely are. Pre-millennial believers and post-millennial believers are all futurists. You all believe that the totality of God's millennium of Revelation 20 is yet future. That is not the case: Premillennialists believe Jesus will physically return to the Earth before the millennium...

Excuses for... what...??? LOL! Right, and right now, Davy, he cannot. He is completely bound from deceiving the nations, meaning he is absolutely unable to prevent the spread of the Gospel to the nations. Thus Jesus's mandate at the end of Matthew's gospel to His disciples, and us by...

Well, not according to your understanding of what's written there, but true none the less. Okay, well, where you get your ideas is from men's Post-mill doctrines. ...according to post-millennialism, but... <smile> Okay, well, I say that not seeing Revelation 19:11-21 and Revelation 20:7-10 as...

There will certainly be a “great tribulation” near the end of the “thousand years,” the (current) millennium, this current time of tribulation…. And it will be, as Jesus said, “For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been from the beginning of the world until now, no, and never...

What I have said, Davy, very clearly, several times, is that the events of Revelation 19:11-21 are the same events — described differently, but the same events — described in Revelation 20:7-10. You obviously don’t have any trouble seeing Christ’s return ther in Revelation 19, but you should see...

Yes, but not with regard to time, but rather who is... actually seems to be... in control. Now, if you want to say, with regard to time, what is eternal and of God rather than temporal and fallen... which is to say of the present age rather than the age to come (eternity), THEN I would agree...

LOL! Well, you're kind of driving me crazy, so to speak, and in some instances, all I can do is laugh. So yeah... LOL! Nope... Absolutely not... You agree with nunc-millennialists that there is not a third coming of Christ. Goodness gracious. No, again, your thinking about my thinking is...

There is no significant elapsing of time between Jesus's second coming and the New Heaven and New Earth... much less a thousand years, as post-millennialists hold. Well, literally destoyed in the sense of ruination, not annihilation, which we agree on. No need to keep harping on this, right...

Interesting. So, how much time do you think will elapse between Christ's second coming and the ushering in of the New Heaven and New Earth? And why? I do. I am asking you why you think it is false. I think I know, but I'm not going to put words into your mouth. I would like to hear your...

Well yes, among other things... Hmmm... Now, here, by "types of the future resurrection," are you referring to the first and second resurrection of Revelation 20? Or are you talking about all being resurrected either to eternal life or to judgment, as Jesus says in John 5:28-29, and...

No, the record is clear. I guess you're just too lazy to review it. That's okay; t is what it is. That's somehow "coded"...? LOL! Dude. Come on. So yeah, absolutely no substance to anything you have said so far... Continued...