Search results

If your position is that Abaddon and satan are one and the same, though personally I disagree they are, you are not making much sense in that case. As if it is reasonable that if the pit is opened and satan is inside, and that satan then says, thanks, but no thanks. I don't want out of here as...

In the NT, in the KJV in this case, there is no exact phrase for 'one thousand'. Yet there is an exact phrase for 'two thousand', 'three thousand', 'four thousand', etc. It then begs the question, what then in the NT means one thousand? 'A thousand' of course. What else if not that? After all...

Seriously, what do hills have to do with years? They are not the same concept. A thousand hills literally means every hill, even if there are billions of hills. One can't argue in the same manner regarding years though, that a thousand years mean every single year since the beginning of time...

As if nothing can ever be compressed in passages where the missing details have to be found elsewhere. It is not reasonable that the very same day Christ returns, 1 Corinthians 15:28 is fulfilled that same day. The way you try and get around all of this, once Christ returns everything that still...

And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days. a thousand(chilioi) two hundred(diakosioi) and threescore(hexekonta) days chilioi + diakosioi + hexekonta = 1260 days Suppose an Amil...

It's an era of time consisting of 1000 literal years. It's that simple since that is the only thing that makes sense of the verse. The same way one day is an era of time consisting of a literal 24 hours. In order to prove the former wrong you first need to prove the latter wrong. Something...

You are not making sense here or you totally misunderstood my point. My point was in regards to the various translations of Matthew 19:28 that @Scott Downey submitted per that post I was addressing at the time. All of them make it crystal clear that the sitting on these thrones happens after...

If your position is, that when they are sitting on these thrones equals them assisting Christ judging others, what passages support that? Take Matthew 25, for instance. Where you take that to also be meaning the GWTJ. If per your view, all of the saved since the beginning of time through the end...

For your sake, not @Spiritual Israelite sake, you need to repent of this. 1 John 3:10 In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother. 11 For this is the message that ye heard from...

In the agricultural world, apparently tares resemble wheat in the early stages. It is then a matter of, what does the wheat symbolize in the parable? Because that is who the tares appear to be masquerading as, the wheat. Matthew 7 should come to mind here, meaning for anyone that has any level...

I won't be losing any sleep over it since it's not possible to reason with you to begin with.

Any of the passages that involve Christ judging and sentencing ppl, such as Matthew 25 and Revelation 20, or any other ones that you can think of , can you point out in the text where you see anyone doing what I quoted from your post above?

Ezekiel 38:20 So that the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the heaven, and the beasts of the field, and all creeping things that creep upon the earth, and all the men that are upon the face of the earth, shall shake at my presence, and the mountains shall be thrown down, and the steep places...

The logic would be this then. He is bound so that he can't deceive the nations to battle anymore until the thousand years are finished. Which then begs the question. What nations was he initially deceiving to battle before getting bound 2000 years ago? After all, what he does after the thousand...

A lot of what you submitted I'm basically in agreement with you about. And it amazes me, the fact you are an Amil, that you possess this level of discernment involving this chapter. Most Amils make nonsense out of the texts involved, not sense out of them like you are attempting to do. But even...

If we apply Zechariah 14:11 spiritually to the here and now, even that can't work. That verse says that Jerusalem shall be dwelling safely. But if we factor in the beast and fp persecuting the saints, that hardly fits dwelling safely. As if, the fact the persecution is literal and in some cases...

Though, that is true, that is beside the point. Zechariah 14 involves prophecy. And that there has to be some form of logical chronology involved. Some of Zechariah 14 couldn't possibly be pertaining to anything in this present age prior to Christ returning, in any sense. Notice that I said some...

Verse 2 says this, for instance---and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city. How does that remotely agree with what history records happened in 70 AD? Then there is verse 3 to factor in--Then shall the LORD go forth, and...

Which Jerusalem do you take that to mean? A lot of these translations of this verse in question, verse 11 in this case, render it---there will be no more curse. Exactly what it also says of the NJ in Revelation 22. Can't remember which verse offhand. The Jerusalem meant in verse 11 will never...

In another post you indicated the beast has been around since the beginning. I do not disagree with that. What about the false prophet, though? Has the false prophet also been around since the beginning? Let's not forget about him or it or they, whatever the fp might be. According to Revelation...