Search results

You don't have to call for it directly. Isn't that exactly what we've been talking about about? Until we realize the hate is coming from both sides of our Christless, partisan quagmire, we're in for more and more of what you're fed up with, friend. .

If by "do nothing" you mean spew hatred on social media then, no, I don't think we should do nothing. "Fed up," are you? Oh, we all love it. Sorry about your problem. :rolleyes: .

How would you suggest we begin holding these hypothetical people accountable? Perhaps we should launch counter-propaganda to cause more random violence. Wait—we've already done that, haven't we? I'm not a big FauxNews fan, but these comments from RFKJr are pretty insightful: (Fox is the...

"They" is a crazed, 20-year-old kid, until we get some better information. Unless, of course, by "reality" you mean your imagination. .

A review of the video at 0.25X speed shows no such thing, especially since a spectator would've had no such luxury. Semi-automatic weapon rapid fire tends to behave that way. There can be no doubt that it was God's will for Mr. Trump to survive the assassination attempt. The reason for this...

There's no "they." But if we keep up the delusional, "us-and-them," divisive rhetoric, maybe we'll see an attempt on the other guy's life, too. I'm sure this'll be seen as censorist talk. We should have freedom of speech, but: 1 Corinthians 10:23 — All things are lawful for me, but all...

Ding! Ding! Ding! WE HAVE A WINNER! If the Democratic party were actively involved in a deliberate assassination attempt, President Trump would be dead this morning. There was nothing standing between the barrel of the shooter's weapon and a fatal target on the person of Mr. Trump, except...

Do you think there could be any application of Romans 14:1 here? :) .

But post#122 isn't in your native language. Is it safe? Hey, you're making up the rules (as you go). .

We can only respond to what you post. .

Uh, your own words. :P .

What constitutes "atheist-infested false biblical scholarship?" .

Regardless of the negative criticisms or characterizations of the Sanctuary doctrine, whether from those within the church or outside, in the end it's primarily about God beneficently choosing to do things transparently, decently, and orderly. Pretty much anything I say above and beyond that...

Now, do you see what you've started? Can't take you anywhere! :P .

You seem to be insisting on some kind of immortality that needs no means of sustenance aside from the abstract idea of said immortality. Correct me if I'm wrong. .

I guess my point is, I can't afford to have to rely on too much outside the Word itself to warrant my faith in it. .

...unless they were never meant to be apart from the tree. At the most basic level of the argument: Food is not the only thing animals need from nature to sustain life. .

Hogwash

Regardless of whatever conclusions you might have drawn, I do not believe death was ever intended for human beings, nor for lower animals. .

Not sure how this proves that animals were born to die from the very beginning... .