Search results

You know what they say about those who assume. Martyr says nothing about anyone teaching amill. And again, Matthew 25:31, 16:27, 19:28, 24:46-47, Luke 12:35-44, 19:11-27, and Revelation 2:25-26, 3:21, 11:18, 22:12 all prove Christ returns to establish his rule, power and authority with the...

Name one and cite their writings. The point is that the for three-hundred years the overwhelming authors whose writings we have are Premill. Even Augustine was a Premillennialists before he changed to amill.:csm

Numerous websites and books prove the extant ante-Nicene writings are overwhelmingly millennialists. The article below cites just a few authors, As Philip Schaff noted, “The most striking point in the eschatology of the ante-Nicene age is the prominent chiliasm, or millennarianism.”[1]...

How silly, Premillennialism, Chiliasm, predated amill, which makes amill the cult of Romanism. It wasn’t until the Roman Emperors entered the scene that Premillennialism was pushed aside. And it wasn’t until Romanism, the papacy, was wounded that Premillennialism returned to triumph over amill...

How silly; Satan is the father of lies and amills gaslight we're in the kingdom. Remove the beam from your eye before trying to remove the splinter from others.

The answer is no. How many times must I answer. It's obvious you don't have eyes and see and ears that listen. Christ is NOT reigning in his kingdom. Are we done with your silly attempt to twist the interpretation of Colossians 1:13? We are not translated or seated in Christ’s kingdom in ANY...

Why don’t you stop being silly. I never said Christ isn’t king, only that he’s not reigning on David’s throne now; that happens when he returns. As scripture states, flesh and blood can’t enter the kingdom. No doubt, you are mortal and flesh and blood, so you’re not in the kingdom. Overcomers...

You’re totally clueless. I never “suggested” anything of the sort in your misrepresentation. I said “Israel” is saved and rules, the nations; let me add, the Church is Israel, Galatians 6 15 For neither circumcision counts for anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creation. 16 And as for all...

As I said, it can’t be Satan because it wouldn’t be helpful in solving the riddle, insomuch he WAS before all the kings. I don’t worry about Satan followers, even if they’re ignorant of it. :csm

See, what petulance! I said Christ was anointed king when he ascended and reigns when he returns. Leave it to those who get it! He acts as an ecclesiastical head and not a temporal ruler until he returns, fulfilling the law and inaugurating the final harvest of Israel to rule the nations...

See, what petulance! I said Christ was anointed king when he ascended and reigns when he returns. Leave it to those who get it! He acts as an ecclesiastical head and not a temporal ruler until he returns, fulfilling the law and inaugurating the final harvest of Israel to rule the nations...

I do believe I've answered this, even if your petulance won't allow you to see it.

As I said, here's what the Wiki article said: Premillennialism experienced a revival among 17th century Puritans like Thomas Brightman, Joseph Mede... What don't you get? How can Mede not be a premillennialist and lead a revival of Premillennialism in his work? :csm Here's what a scholar...

In addressing your petulance, the resolution is in the example of David. He was anointed as “king” of Israel, but did not reign until Saul died some 20 years later. Christ ascended to receive the kingship as in Luke 19:12, but doesn’t reign until he returns and rewards the overcomers with rule...

How silly. Answer the challenges and spare me the ad hominems.

No, you can’t maintain context. The events are about what John sees concerning the time of the sixth king and the judgment of the harlot Babylon. He is not moving from that perspective. He looks back to the five fallen kings and looks forward when one of them rises to war with Christ at his...

Come on, you suggested that the kings that had fallen were Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia and Greece. All of a sudden, according to the dogma of futurism, the last king becomes an individual man, poof, by magic and dogma. But proper exegesis is consistent and rational, which maintains each of...

What’s satanic is the attempt to gaslight believers that Christ has all things under his subjection, when the scriptures say he doesn’t (Hebrews 2:8). How typical, side-stepping that the passage is in the prophetic aorist sense and that flesh and blood can’t inherit the kingdom of God, which...

Here's what the Wiki article said: Premillennialism experienced a revival among 17th century Puritans like Thomas Brightman, Joseph Mede... What don't you get? How can Mede not be a premillennialist and lead a revival of Premillennialism in his work? :csm Here's what a scholar wrote about...

Actually, I’ve expressed that Christ is not reigning now several times; it’s your comprehension that’s shot. The term “transferred” in Colossians 1:13 is in the prophetic aorist or formed proleptically. If you had done proper research, you wouldn’t be finding your guilty of eisegesis. Prolepses...