Search results

Perhaps I have beaten around the bush--but no, I have openly stated that what I am bringing to the table--it is given to be by God. Which to some sounds like arrogance...and that is why I have seemingly skirted around the issue of authority. A good question for everyone to ask, is: How would YOU...

You have listed many issues, and I suspect it is because of the language difference. But the perplexity of many here is due to the lie that has been taught now for 2,000 years--as the scriptures say. That is my testimony--just what the scriptures say. As for many "last days" spoken of in...

No--and don't be silly. The scriptures are not a lie, but do tell of a lie. Do you not know of this?

True...only it is not the time that most believe. In other words, Jesus comes again in the glory of the Father beginning "soon" after He went to the Father. Which is to say, His second coming is spiritual, as He described, saying, "Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears My voice...

Yes, Jesus answered and said to them, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up” (John 2:19). But there are other passages also that fill in the details and qualify the greater context and meaning (in addition to Jesus rising from the tomb, which is the more immediate...

This is not a discussion. The last days were confirm by Peter as beginning during the times of the apostles. What you are missing is the timing. That was the "lie."

I have already addressed them as we went along. But mainly your agreeing and looking for Jesus only to return in the future, after He said He was coming "soon", referring to all that "must shortly come to pass", then stating in present tense "Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone...

This is one of the great mysteries of God, and one of the gravest points of error within the Church. Most have wrongly believed that Jesus gave the keys of the kingdom to Peter to then be passed on from man-to-man…or from one of “flesh and blood” to others of “flesh and blood”—exactly opposite...

Those who walked in the ways of the LORD early in the history of His people and before Christ, whom God deemed to be righteous, simply walked according to the path set before them by God. But this touches on a larger biblical reality. Which is a hard thing to perceive from most places within...

You are not taking God at His word on even the most elementary level. Unless you can acknowledge that Jesus first came "but for the house of Israel" (as He said), "finished" (as He said), and then moved on to this "other fold" of the gentiles which He "must also bring" (as He said)--you are...

The error in context is now ages old, as foretold--as I have explained numerous times. Which is the timing of Christ's return for the gentiles after He had finished with Israel, just as He said. But here you are continually beating the same drum of errors already at work during the time of the...

No. I will not be lead down a path leading to what you seem to consider erroneous.

Great post! Indeed, all that is true. The good news is that even so, even though the flock has been left to be tended by householders and shepherds even doing poorly, the flock is secure in Christ, for He has not left us as orphans, but is with us through even these pitiful times. Which were to...

Your statement very much seemed like you were saying that all Christians (paraphrasing) having the Holy Spirit, already have correction and thus have no need of further correction. That would be like saying that when one is born again of the spirit of God they have access to...

Why are you not tracking with your own previous post? It was a very nice post! I was responding to this statement you made at the end of that previous post: Here again is my response: They do, though they have not yet been fully understood by many.

Yes, "a figure of speech"--and not of the Spirit, but of the teachings of men now for centuries.

Even so, revelations from God only come in the fulness of time.

They do, though they have not yet been fully understood by many.

On the contrary, "the words are spirit", and do not speak of a worldly return of Israel to an earthly promise land, but are gathered "in heaven"--just as it says.

You are close here, you wrote it out but didn't come out and state what it means: That the passage(s) are not speaking of a gathering of Israel in the world--but "of heaven."