Search results

In simple translation Gog means "Mountain", and Magog means "Land of the Mountain." The "Mountain" is God, and the land is the earth or world. Meaning, the war of Gog and Magog, is between God and this world. Which is waged by the "dividing of light from the darkness"--told from the...

This regards the "firstfruits" of the Spirit. In other words, Jesus is the First of those who from that point in history on, would be born first of the spirit of God. While those who had come since Adam unto that time, would be Last to enter into the spirit of God. Which is because even though...

Yes, but you are not addressing the issue, but avoiding it. The issue of this thread is the difference between what was true when Jesus answered the question (in present tense 2,000 years ago), as opposed to after receiving "all truth" promised as future tense. Which means Jesus was either...

Okay. So, what do you say--would you say that the promise of "all truth" made by Christ, includes, or does not include "knowing the day or the hour of the coming of the Son of man?"

UNFORTUNATELY, that study is according to the "destructive doctrines" taught by the "false teachers" foretold by Peter, and the "lie" warned of by Paul.

I have already stated it publicly: But I will ask a question that anyone is welcome to consider: Just how were God's people to go from "believing a lie" of "destructive doctrines" and "great apostacy", to knowing "all truth" and the "finish of the mystery of God as He declared to His servants...

First--I am not going to keep rehashing all these issues after all this time--but rather declare the truth, for this is that time. I explained the above regarding Jesus' ascension already--in an effort to first offer reason. And to finish with that effort, please try to reason within yourself...

Okay. That could all be said more concisely, simply that Jesus first came physically only to the house of Israel (as He said), and then comes [again] in spirit unto the gentiles and every people, since Pentecost after sending the Holy Spirit, saying also "Behold, I stand at the door and knock...

You make a great point. Jesus (as the Last of Israel, and the First of the firstfruits of the Spirit) announced that "It is finished" regarding Israel--who are the dead in Christ--as He said "I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.". But that moment of "It is finished"...

Welcome pepper! I am not making statements lightly. In fact, I studied, and trained, and waited upon the Lord in silence of His restraint for nearly 40 years, until the restraint was removed in the fulness of time. But don't expect me to give witness to myself. I've said enough. Also, I don't...

Unsubstantiated emotional conjecture.

Okay--DOUG--with all these closely titled threads about the same "different gospel" theme, you're repeating yourself like a broken record. Why?

Yes, in a very basic sort of way, with each day being a repeat of first the evening (darkness) and then the morning, it is equal opportunity for every person of every generation every day, to go from darkness (evil) to light (good/God). Just brilliant!

...If I were in Spark--I would!

Of course there are lots of passages to refer to, for the misunderstandings and misinterpretations have been going on for millennia. I might have to number your objections. Jesus ascending "physically" is an assumption. What is written is rather, "in like manner" not actually stating just what...

You're not stupid...but you are back on your haunches like the Priests of Jesus' time about to repeat their folly. During these times--which are biblical, there is more than handwriting on the wall, and I have been quoting it. If you don't want to go so far as to believe that God would repeat...

That distinction simply shows one truth regarding two different groups--each "of" different need, under the One True Gospel. Which is salvation in Christ to the dead and to the living, as Paul also said, "but each one in his own order." Again, that difference is not different in Christ, but...

I get that, but the question remains the same: Would your own letter to a Jew, and another to a gentile be the same or different? Would your own words not be "of" one distinct explanation as opposed to the other, even "of" the same gospel?

I suppose then that you would be equally "polite"...to perhaps...Noah, if he told you what God had tasked him to do. How nice of you.

It is the audience that is different, not the gospel. If you yourself wrote a letter to a Jew regarding salvation, and another to a gentile--would the letters be the same or different?