Search results

Because denominations are evil. I think we can consider that settled, based entirely on what the majority of forum participants say. Again, it's trendy—all the rage, in fact. Why should they? I can't see how what I like really matters. Which would make you a mind reader, if I'm not...

A day is not a way, and a way is not a day. There are some that say this way is the right day, however. And that is confusion. .

You should talk. :rolleyes: .

Right, everyone should be fruitful and multiply—just don't allow things to grow and become efficient to the point that they have to make a distinction between what they believe and teach and what others do. Very sound, human reasoning The only problem is, things have changed just a little in...

A bit of heresy here and there doth not (necessarily) a heretic make. :) .

Believe it when I see it - lol. .

My mistake—this must be one of those special "topic-only" threads. .

You better believe it is .

Trump/Biden and "OSAS"—we should have an all-star showdown of topics - lol. On second thought, "OSAS" is probably NOT a close 2nd. .

I'm afraid I wouldn't have any idea how to treat someone as saved or damned. I hear this kind of thing all the time and I just don't get it. If someone leans too heavily on me about any point of doctrine, I figure I'm free to log off or put them on -ignore-, so I just have no idea what all the...

Please define "look down to." From what, exactly, are you defending people—imaginary assaults in voluntary forum discussion? What's your attitude regarding Christians who don't observe the rituals of baptism or communion, or are you of a mind that Christians needn't do anything at all to...

Yeah .

Why do they have to be white? .

Of course you're right. We should have to give account for discussing a sufficient variety of topics. Kind of like an Affirmative Action discussion policy. Diversity is okay as long as certain people don't get to decide what "diversity" means. By the way, who's going to be in charge of...

But the "happiness" is fleeting—it's just a dopamine fix for most, unfortunately. :( .

It's a peculiar thing, but I distinctly remember practically every bit of enjoyment I got out of McD's, but I'd also much rather have a huge chunk of fresh pineapple. Eat nothing but fruits, nuts, vegetables, and grains for a 10 days and your appetite will change. :) .

No, I don't think you do. Because I don't have a problem with your post. I was just making a few observations about it and the thread, in general, which you seem to have taken as a personal attack. That's obviously regrettable. I didn't word your remarks differently. I used the same words from...

I have to say, this is truly bizarre reasoning. You're definitely barking up the wrong tree. .

People are entitled to their naive and indefensible opinions? If it's just an opinion and they're entitled to it, why does it need to be defensible? And "indefensible at the very least?" Is naivete vastly ("very") worse than something that is indefensible? This thread just seems to be...

Which is pretty much the point of the article from The Hill, and has not escaped my attention. But you're omitting some of the information, which is to be expected, I suppose. Evidently, 80% of the Bar consists of something called "Demonrats," so it probably doesn't matter how much you read...