Search results

Okay, you don’t know the name of the son per Matt 28:19. I get it. Do you think Peter, who was there at Matt 28, may have figured it out when he commanded folks to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins? Or, should Peter have took your position and tell them to be...

What is the name of the son per Matthew 28:19, That is if the sons name is not known per that verse?

Anyone that disobeys Acts 2:38 is protesting Peter etc. This includes the RCC, SDA, LDS, JWs, Baptists, Lutherans, Methodists, AGs, non denoms, etc etc etc.... The RCC is the mother of all Acts 2:38 protestors, thus the queen of protestants, lording over her various offspring. The RCC is the...

What is the name of the son per the highlighted?

I like BOL. He is cool, but silly. A person has to understand his gruff demeanor to understand Catholic priests.

As I have previously said... The forums melt down when asked what the name of the son is per Matt 28:19. This answer was a typical example of a meltdown. Factinatingly terrifying.

So, the name of the son per Matt 28:19 is unknown?

What is the name of the son per Matthew 28:19? A…Joe B…Jack C…Jesus Pick one

Of course they don’t think the name of the son is son. But if they admit that the name of the son is Jesus per Matthew 28:19, then they have to baptize in the name of Jesus exclusively like Peter did and all of the disciples did in the book of Acts. This is why nobody will openly admit that the...

Since the Catholics and her daughters run around praying saying Jesus and not son…This should tell you that it is weird that they have a Joe Biden moment and think the name son is son per Matthew 28:19. It is a scam. Recognize a scam when you see it. It’s an attack on Acts 2:38.

Whatever we do, we must do in the name of Jesus Christ. That means speaking his name. If you don’t speak his name, everything you’re doing is ineffective when it comes to the work of his Kingdom.

Jesus is the least we can say verbally. Whatsoever we do in Word or deed we are to do all in the name of Jesus. Baptism is both word and deed.

Son is not the name of the son.

Acts 2:38- Matt 28:19 comparison In this video, I explain what I mean by the Catholic Church and the others that think the name of the son is son.

Acts 2:38 was commanded to be obeyed by Peter to adult sinners. AKA people that can comprehend what Peter was saying. He was not preaching to infants.

The Catholics teach that the name of the son is son. They don’t say I baptize you in the name of the father and in the name of Jesus and in the name of of the Holy Ghost. They skip the name of Jesus entirely. Plus, babies cannot repent. Plus, babies cannot receive the gift of the Holy Ghost per...

Lesson 7- Page 7 This is how the Catholic Church was founded.

I used to be a Catholic. I know all about the Catholic Church. I know all about the history of the Catholic Church. They are the queen of all Acts skippers. They are the church that started, mixed with paganism, Judaism and Christianity and their number one main objective was to cause people to...

They did not exist as an entity back then in the first century. They developed into what is known as the Catholic Church in Rome in the fourth century.

The Roman Catholic church is unfounded in scripture, just like hundreds and perhaps thousands of their doctrines that are unfounded. They don’t even resemble the first century church in the book of Acts. They are a later religion that are comprised of paganism, Judaism and Christianity. They...