Search results

The church of Rome in the first century that Paul addressed was not the Roman Catholic Church. The RCCs that were the pagans that later centuries adopted some Christian ideas. The Romans that Paul addressed the obeyed the book of Acts(2:38), which the Roman Catholic Church opposed vehemently...

The Roman Catholic Church and the Catholic Church are the exact same entity. They are synonymous.

Not at all, you guys teach that he that is baptized shall eventually believe and be saved. It’s backward theology. I guess when you baptize unrepentant and untaught newborn children, that’s what you end up with.

Your post is a false witness of the 500 true witnesses. There was no such thing as the Roman Catholic Church in the first century.

Wrong, over 500 people witnessed the resurrected Jesus and told the world of it. Then the NT was written about it, pre Catholicism.

The Roman Catholics teach you, he that is baptized then eventually believeth shall be saved. They are as bad as their protestant daughters that teach he that believeth and is saved shall be baptized… Lol

The biblical order is to teach them then to baptize them. Not baptize them, then teach them. Boy what a mess.

Another weird thing that the Roman Catholics practice, the Bible says to go and teach all nations baptizing them… I have never heard of a Catholic teaching an infant and baptizing them. What’s wrong with this picture?

Infants are unable to obey Acts 2:38.

Obeying Acts 2:38 is the universal starting point for all Christians. Everybody else need not apply.

I am only obeying Acts 2:38 in its most simplistic terms. It is you fellas that are trying to talk your way out of it.

He that believeth not shall be damned… because obviously he will not be baptized.

Bunch of “Christians“ running around telling everybody what they believe the Bible says …..without themselves having the remission of sins. This is like the twilight zone.

No, read this carefully Then Peter said unto them repent, and be baptized, every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins…. Not because of, not formerly having, but for the…

I am putting 1/2 of one verse for you to read because you cannot even get past it. You can’t even get baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of your sins so why should we talk about more? You have to have remission of sins before you can apply Romans through Revelations to your...

The baptism of the New Testament church was a burial. It is found in Romans chapter 6. It says we are buried with Christ through baptism. If you don’t get baptized, you’re not buried with Christ. If you think you are already alive and are baptized then you will be buried alive. I think that’s...

You didn’t get what I was saying. The Samaritans, which are half gentile were commanded to be baptized in the name of Jesus. Cornelius the gentile and his gentile, family and friends were all commanded to be baptized in the name of Jesus. Has anybody ever commanded you to be baptized in the name...

Jews, Samaritans and gentiles were all commanded to be baptized in the name of the Lord. I don’t know how you can separate them. I guess you guys have all skipped act and don’t have a choice.

No, good truth preaching. I will tell you what… If you right here and now say that you baptize in the name of Jesus Christ, and you teach others to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins then I will apologize.

Notice how you debunked the verse that you posted? He that believeth…And is… Baptized…. You made it say something else. Thou art the man.