Search results

All the readers have to do is look through our conversations and see that you live in the fantasy world of conspiracy theories.

Is your religion entirely made up of conspiracy theories?

You are boring me now.

LOL

No it just proves prefer hearsay and conspiracy theories.

All they got to do is read and the truth be known.

Try getting a statement from these various modern translations instead of these hearsay sources.

It is an old conspiracy theory and scam that has long been laid to rest. Published with permission from The Lockman Foundation The Board of Directors of The Lockman Foundation launched the NEW AMERICAN STANDARD BIBLE translation work in the late 1950’s following the completion of the AMPLIFIED...

Anyone that has read along with conversation knows who the conspiracy enthusiast is.

LOL I guess you do not know that people can see right through you. What you say is not only not true….it does not even make sense. To you conspiracy theories are truth and reality, that is called an alternate reality. I am sure that most reading our conversations have picked up on that. And...

Again you live in conspiracy theories. Dr. frank logsdon made money scamming people. He was never involved with the translating process and never on the board….I listed those who were on the board….His involvement with them was not much more than taking out the trash. People can look this up.

You live in the world of conspiracy theories. The inaccuracies and inadequacies of the KJV are a matter of facts. I listed the errors of the KJV and people can look them up for themselves. And to keep things in perspective again…. 1. I like the KJV Bible a lot. Just for different reasons than...

I did not say that Nestle and Aland did or did not consider the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus? Quit trying to put words in my mouth. I disagree with your attempt to pigeon hole the work of those translating the scriptures. It does not matter if it the NASB or NIV or ESV. The word "based" is not the...

History of the New American Standard Bible The Lockman Foundation In 1604 a revision of the Bishops’ Bible of 1568 was commissioned. This revision, first printed in 1611, came to be known as the King James Version and is considered a landmark in the history of English Bible translation. More...

Like I said I would find it interesting to have a detailed run down of the translation process for the NASB by the Lockman Foundation. But you are only going to get that from the Lockman Foundation or one or more of the board members. What you got for quotes from the internet are accurate...

Define used? Just one of many resources. And I am with you on one thing I wish we had a break down of how the process went down. Even the discussions. And regardlees of what resouces they looked at there nothing to say that they included any of the errors in the modern translations.

NO. In court they call that “leading the witness” LOL Define “used for” As in do you believe that the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus are the two primary manuscripts that are used for both the Westcott and Hort text, and all subsequent Modern Translations after that? Again modern translations are...

Are you saying that at this point you still do not know what I believe in regard to Modern Scholarship's view.

copy and past here from post 369 you said--->First, I asked you what are the oldest and best manuscripts,

You have and odd style of debating. You say things that are not true to try to get people to believe what you say is true. LOL I did not dodge the question I said….copy and pasted here---> If you do not understand what the oldest biblical manuscripts means….we can discuss it. Lets start with...