Search results

Be aware...many have adopted the new age religion interpretations since the 1960's. It is a way to not be restricted by God's standards of righteousness and yet put a cross around the neck and PROFESS TO BE A CHRISTIAN. Weird.

Use the proper references.....judged...is proper reference. God slaughters no one. You are slaughtering yourself for your assertions. You do it and then blame God. Yet He would forgive you...should you decide to repent. Suggest you study scriptures.

It is and .......appalling. Examples they interpret the Bible as follows; Baptism is not necessary OSAS...once saved always saved. Universalism...all will be saved. Repentance not needed.....Christ sacrifice on the cross automatically forgives us of sins. Et al. Yes they are doctrines of...

New age religion interpretations of the Bible are amazing.....and they did not exist before the 1960's,

Christ never sinned while on this earth therefore He need not be born again. Your reading is a little wet here.

What is your point?

Nothing in the Bible speaks that infants must be baptized. Repentance must be followed by baptism in order to be ...born again. Infants have not sinned yet.

That is the new age religion type.

You sure it is not because the Muslim faith has no Christian value comparison? By that less restrictions of life style to ally with? I believe that needs consideration if you wish to compare apples to apples. Just a thought.

Don't you think you need to distinguish between darkness ...as from daylight vs darkness from sinfulness? I do...to make your question clear and absent of dangling participle residue.

LOL....i dont think you are aware; Lord's prayer....thy kingdom comes thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.... Bible revision edition....thy kingdom comes thy will be done in earth as it is in heaven.... Not only is not necessary...it is wrong grammar....It turns clear writings into...

I cannot accept your conclusion KJV 1611 is in any way.... archaic. It is everything but.....that is an excuse for revision while the revisionist ad and subtract in intent and meaning. I have yet to have anyone providing a clear and specific example of that. I have looked at comparisons on the...

You ask if Jesus was a .....new age....(I conclude you mean .....religion....) I would say not...otherwise He would have no faith in His Father. There have been many elements of society against God and His word through out history. The righteous have shown their opposition correctly so...

I never said The thief was baptized. But, you did say that he was NOT baptized. You have failed to show scripture. Be blessed. This is an example of why a watchful eye from the board of the forum is needed. Young Christians can be miss led and frustrated.

I never said he had been baptized. Show me??? My last comment.

The narrative is that u said He had not been baptized...and you can't back that up. Stay with the narrative.

Oh...i doubt it. I am always willing to listen and consider...but, not with the new age religion concepts which include; Warped interpretation of God's word Baptism isn't necessary Universalism is the path of righteousness OSAS Many interpretations of His word since the 1960's (What.... during...

I know it was first written in the original Hebrew words......Aramaic. That was not english !!!!

I thought I detected some ...new age religion...presence in your thinking. Until you believe in God's word.....study. I recommend 1611 edition Of KJV.

Did you explain why one new edition refers to ...gods....instead of God? Let me know your explanation. When I challenged them their explanation was ...trinity...three gods. Sorry u believe that.