Search results

Lol. No door is ajar as you tried to imply. How many things did you change, in that parable? Your doctrine is so bizarre that you change God's word. SMH

Iow you think ,erroneously ,the white horse coming depicted in Rev 19 , is the same as rev14? Explain that bizarre belief.

All refusing the mark are killed...not protected. Your entire assumption is against the truth. You really are unaware that millions die by refusing the mark? NOT AT ALL PROTECTED.

They hate the idea that the bride is gathered pretrib. Then proceed to modify the bible. And when challenged to provide a postrib rapture verse, they can not.

QUOTE; "Pretribulationists miss (or ignore) the fact that the promise being given here was actually written to the Philadelphian believers in John’s day." Under this guidance we should never read romans because it was written to Romans.

We can all see, that even though the foolish virgins are vividly depicted as believers, you need that changed. But it gets worse. Because now you actually need half of earth's population to be unbelievers and half saved. Nope .we can now see how Making changes to the Bible, will lead you into a...

God's pure Word. Some can not respect it. Doctrine has them actually changing God's Holy Word. My job..report what the Bible says. Then folks go against the bible.

Well here we have your 3rd try. 100% dodge again. Try real hard. You made the claim. You are out on a limb doctrinally . Half the world is saved according to your doctrine. Postrib rapture doctrine has left all adherents in the desert afoot.

Both examples have the BELIEVER in the same sin. Lukewarm and carnal. But I know you need oil to not represent the Holy Spirit. So you will never unpack what is actually going on.

We all know to be obedient. We all know you are not. John said if any man says he does not sin he is a liar. I want to know how you get forgiveness. What is the remedy that God made? I could give you a hint. ( has to do with innocence)

Actually no. The wise virgins told the foolish to go and buy from those who sell. Both the foolish virgins as well as the lukewarm laodiceans were told to go and buy something.

1 Thessalonians 5 2 For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. 3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape. 4 But ye, brethren, are not in...

You notice the remedy was given to his people? You notice "buy" is not actual buying? You notice "gold" is not real gold? Rich, white, eyesalve, seeing, nakedness are all symbolic? "Buying" in the virgin parable is not actually buying.

Did he have a measure of the Holy Spirit? Is that what you are asking? All kings are anointed by the prophet with oil. Saul was as was David. Maybe you can just say what you are getting at? David said "take not thy HS from me." David's anointing was prophet, priest and King. Saul's was king and...

That is the second post where you can not rise to the simple challenge. I guess you simply have no postrib rapture verses. I asked you ( or any postribber) to post one, and all you did was go off on some side issue. Maybe one of your colleagues has a verse. You better sit this one out friend. I...

Is that supposed to prove something? Both sides of the debate believe all that.

Yeah. Whooda thought that oil represents the Holy Spirit? Just a coincidence that Christians have oil, light, and are vessels containing the Holy Spirit, waiting and watching for Jesus. No connection at all...wink wink. Just a coincidence that virgins are pure, set apart and undefiled as are...

Got you all frustrated over the components of the parable. It reads and reports so simple and vivid. Sorry your doctrine needs it changed. We all know what a parable is. The problem for you is the changes you need . Your doctrine did that to you

Solomon came under David. That was a "side covenant" between God and David concerning David's descendants. In fact when Soloman sinned God told him he would have cut Him off, it it were not for his daddy David. ( referring to that covenant with David's descendants).