Search results

No, and obviously you aren't able to quote Satan saying that. But, to the contrary, your repeating your doctrinal beliefs as a defense, is very much like the definition of insanity...and I would be happy to quote it for you if this is news to you.

This touches on so much, so many considerations.. A friend once told me, reflecting back over his life and the places he had lived, and his marriage, "You can fall in love anywhere." Which, I suppose would be the same for many things: finding work (maybe), making friends, etc. Certainly, one...

This is a topic greatly misunderstood by many. Daniel said, "came" and "was." Jesus said "is." Paul said "were." John said "was." Etc. All but Jesus spoke of the timing as past tense. Jesus spoke in present tense. If I said they were all correct...would I be wrong? What then of the many...

We moved for economic reasons, not really political. Not sure what your need for moving is. If not for the economic reasons, I would say, simply move away from whatever is hectic. Perhaps to the country, but within a reasonable distance to necessities. Live simple. And wherever you are, vote.

As it is written, "the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world." This is the abomination that makes desolation. After which came death, and every abomination laid upon Christ. Which is also the great tribulation, for there can be no greater tribulation than was upon Christ, because it was...

You didn't answer the question. Repeating your doctrinal beliefs only makes it worse.

This is how you speak of God? Paul did not, but you, you are on dangerous ground.

I didn't go read all the link info---but yes, just as the narrow way is unorthodox to the many, so is the sure salvation of passing from death to life in Christ from which and to which no one can return.

Is after "before the foundation of the world" amillennial? hmn

Great trick...Not sure I follow, but I'll have to try it. Thanks!

No. “We ought to obey God rather than men."

I did already, by quoting Jesus explaining just how this all works. There is nothing better to be said--but it's not me who said it, I just repeated what He said. Your rejecting it, is you rejecting Him.

No, you are wrong. I quoted Jesus straight away. You on the other recommended another (go). And here you are again confirming it.

Typical response from you :rolleyes: (for the record).

I shook your tree and the fruit...well, it's enough. So let it be written.

I recommend you read Jesus and not lump me in with those you send elsewhere.

Not really...it's just that when I type in the word "c o n f u s e d" it is auto-replaced with this: confused ...which does not make for good communication. Can that be changed?

The occurrence of miracles is from God and not to be muddled with the seeking of signs which is from men. These must be rightly divided by the source of each, as they are completely different. Again, God is the same yesterday, today, and forever. Thus the issue is not with God but with men and...

This may as well be a state of the church statement--not that it is true. But because miracles are the measure of belief as Christ gave witness. Meaning, the seeming absence of miracles, does not mean they passed with the twelve apostles, but rather passed when people began to believe the...

Whether it was you or others or Rick Joyner in his book, I was referring to the tenancy that many have of looking only at the immediate or local occurrence (Act) or context of events relayed by God who did indeed speak into their lives historically, but has also spoke into the lives of all, for...