Search results

They are completely different as the text shows different combatants and different outcomes and different purposes. You also have to separate the antichrist and the beast you even used both terms in the same sentence. Just like John describes the battles differently with different combatants...

That’s not what I’m claiming at all I’m say that if it’s literal then all flesh means all flesh Im claiming that it’s symbolic for Jesus defeating all of His enemies over time with the sword of His mouth which is all powerful and the only weapon He needs

But it says horses too Im not the one saying that’s it’s literal you guys are

First it says all flesh so if literal it’s all flesh Second your mistake is that you think the battle in chapter 16 is the same as the battle in chapter 19 So to stay true to scripture Rev 16 is the battle at Armageddon which is the kings and the beast destroying Babylon the great which is...

But it doesn’t say that it separates the armies and people so if its literal it’s all people Revelation 19:17-18 17 And I saw an angel standing in the sun, who cried in a loud voice to all the birds flying in midair, “Come, gather together for the great supper of God, 18 so that you may eat...

So if its literal then is the fresh of all people eaten by the birds?

Yes of course but it says that they eat the flesh of all people so who could be around for the thousand years?

The city now that God loves in revelation chapter 20 is the new Jerusalem the church Hebrews 12:23-23 22 But you have come to Mount Zion, to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem. You have come to thousands upon thousands of angels in joyful assembly, 23 to the church of the...

The army in revelation 20 is the conformed world which surround the dwindling church the camp of Gods people the city He loves

Because a lot of the church conforms I already explained that, Armageddon has nothing to do with the thousand years

Scripture doesn't say that in either of those verse I quoted in both of those chapters scripture actually says that babylon the great is destroyed

You missed verse 19 of chapter 16 19 The great city split into three parts, and the cities of the nations collapsed. God remembered Babylon the Great and gave her the cup filled with the wine of the fury of his wrath. I also never said that Babylon is a part of chapter 19 because she isn’t

No the thousand years is symbolic for the NT church age

Actually scripture says that satan is bound by deceiving the nations not from battles The difference is what we think that the bible is. The key is the great chain which is the power of the gospel which prevents satan from deceiving whoever chooses to believe it

It never happened literally is a sign of being cursed and judged People are supposed to eat animals not the other way around. Revelation isn’t a literal battle its a symbolic image of Jesus defeating all of His enemies over time with the sword of His mouth which is His word and is all powerful...

Armageddon isn’t a battle against the Lamb it is against Babylon the great in chapter 16 and 17

I’ll have to get back to this later but if you think that the beast and these kings destroy Babylon the great how about these verses? Revelation 17:16-18 16 The beast and the ten horns you saw will hate the prostitute. They will bring her to ruin and leave her naked; they will eat her flesh and...

Yes there is only one second appearing of Jesus and it’s in the future I am referring to His coMing in judgement which isn’t an appearing

Because your thinking what the thousand years is is wrong we reign in life now over death and sin

No we are talking about Babylon because she is part of Armageddon in chapter 16 If you can’t answer the rest of the questions then it’s useless to continue to debate I posted relevent scriptures which proves you wrong all you have to answer is yes or no you need to put your pride aside