How can the thousand years start 40 years prior to Armageddon?
Because your thinking what the thousand years is is wrong
we reign in life now over death and sin
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
How can the thousand years start 40 years prior to Armageddon?
Armageddon cannot have occurred yet as none of the surrounding events also mentioned in scripture occurred back in the late first century times. One big one is the second appearing of Christ. There is only ever a second time, not a third, fourth etc... appearing of Christ.
I was not talking to the OP was I.But the Op is presenting an Amil argument. He believes in a future coming of Christ. Can you not address his argument?
Really? You force a Second Coming into the text of Revelation 20 to suit your theology. In fact you claim this final battle of Armageddon is in Revelation 20 yourself, when not mentioned in the text. You claim this is the end in all your recaps, even when shown different circumstances and outcomes.Armageddon is not even mentioned there. You force it into the text to support your error. This again shows us that Premils are not literalists, only when it suits their theology.
I’ll have to get back to this later but if you think that the beast and these kings destroy Babylon the great how about these verses?You are thinking of the 7th vial.
The 6th vial gathers all humanity to Armageddon to fight the Lamb.
The city does not move. Human armies move.
Once again in Revelation 17:12-14
"And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast. These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast. These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful."
These armies gather to fight the Lamb.
These kings don't attack Babylon. They watch her burn to the ground.
"And the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication and lived deliciously with her, shall bewail her, and lament for her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning, Standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgment come."
Satan's empire comes crashing down. Those kings still have to fight the Lamb. Where else, but in Revelation 19 is this battle? Is Jesus not the Lamb they fight?
"And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army. And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone."
Their empire was destroyed, and now Satan, the FP, and the beast with nothing left, come with what is left of humanity to Armageddon.
Of course no more humans are left alive. The sheep and the wheat are part of the Lamb's army, who now are given the earth as their inheritance. They have been waiting on the sea of glass in Revelation 15, until the 42 months were over. They are the remnant of all mankind who like Noah, after the Flood populate the earth, after the cleansing fire of the Second Coming. They are the final harvest gathered before Satan even sets up His AoD on earth for 42 months.
No one is saved post Revelation 13. They are gathered before the AoD even starts. Those who choose God in this 42 months are those beheaded people who are now physically dead. That is what happens when your head is chopped off. You physically die. That is not metaphor or symbolism. They literally are beheaded. They are resurrected and given permanent incorruptible physical bodies to live on earth for 1,000 years. They are not the church glorified. If that were the case they would have been raptured at the Second Coming, the 6th Seal back in Revelation 6.
Amil conflate a literal physical beheading and resurrection with the second birth via the Holy Spirit. They are so adamant that there cannot be a future 1,000 year reign of Christ, they cannot even get a physical beheading and physical resurrection correct in their interpretation of Scripture.
Revelation 19 is not the Second Coming. It is to destroy humanity that was given a 42 month extension to choose God, thus have a chance to chop off their heads to make that choice. No one makes it to the end alive. They are all dead. Those who remain in the Lamb's book of life chopped their heads off. The rest were killed at Armageddon in Revelation 19.
There is a physical resurrection in Revelation 20:4. That is how those beheaded enter the Millennium. They are physically given a permanent incorruptible physical body. They reign with Christ on earth. They are saved as a firebrand snatched out of the fire. But certainly are not given the same reward and life as the glorified church.
If Amil deny all these points, they work themselves into an impossible situation. Even people who claim Revelation 19 is the Second Coming, are forced into making up explanations, instead of just normal interpretation of Scripture. Revelation 15:2 explains where the redeemed are during these last 42 months when Satan is in charge on the earth.
"And I saw as it were a sea of glass mingled with fire: and them that had gotten the victory over the beast, and over his image, and over his mark, and over the number of his name, stand on the sea of glass, having the harps of God."
Is there a strong argument these are not who comes back with Jesus in Revelation 19?
"And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean."
Does not an army occupy the land they take back from the enemy?
The reformed theology claiming Matthew 24:29-31 below is a "Symbolic" Judgemebt upon Israel is a joke, it represents a literal, visible, second coming of Jesus Christ after a "Future" Great TribulationYes there is only one sec appearing of Jesus and it’s in the future I am referring to His com in judgement which isn’t an appearing
No, you claim Armageddon was in 70AD, and the 1,000 years started in 30AD. It does not matter how you define 1,000.Because your thinking what the thousand years is is wrong
we reign in life now over death and sin
Because it is her religion they destroy.I’ll have to get back to this later but if you think that the beast and these kings destroy Babylon the great how about these verses?
Revelation 17:16-18
16 The beast and the ten horns you saw will hate the prostitute. They will bring her to ruin and leave her naked; they will eat her flesh and burn her with fire. 17 For God has put it into their hearts to accomplish his purpose by agreeing to hand over to the beast their royal authority, until God’s words are fulfilled. 18 The woman you saw is the great city that rules over the kings of the earth.”
Really? You force a Second Coming into the text of Revelation 20 to suit your theology. In fact you claim this final battle of Armageddon is in Revelation 20 yourself, when not mentioned in the text. You claim this is the end in all your recaps, even when shown different circumstances and outcomes.
And...when should it be said that birds began to eat the flesh of the dead?Revelation 19:17-18
17 And I saw an angel standing in the sun, who cried in a loud voice to all the birds flying in midair, “Come, gather together for the great supper of God, 18 so that you may eat the flesh of kings, generals, and the mighty, of horses and their riders, and the flesh of all people, free and slave, great and small.”
If this was before the thousand years then who would be around for it if the flesh of all people were eaten by the birds?
And...when should it be said that birds began to eat the flesh of the dead?
No birds have ever eaten men's flesh yet?When He returns at the end.
No birds have ever eaten men's flesh yet?![]()
So much for giving you a clue about the [actual] timing.How about reading what I wrote. It is yet future!
So much for giving you a clue about the [actual] timing.
How about this one:
Revelation 19:17-18Then I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the birds that fly in the midst of heaven, “Come and gather together for the [a]supper of the great God, 18 that you may eat the flesh of kings, the flesh of captains, the flesh of mighty men, the flesh of horses and of those who sit on them, and the flesh of all people, free and slave, both small and great.”Could "all" [actually] mean all (--like it actually says), or just "future" people?
Kind of yes But its not the antichrist it’s the beast as John describes the beast and their purposes different
The battle at Armageddon was Rome destroying Jerusalem in 70AD and the people were the Jews who realize that they rejected and killed their God and messiah
The thousand years started at the cross
God’s Word also claims Jesus reigns for 1,000 years before creation is handed back. I take God’s Word over your imagined opinion.Jesus said in Matthew 24:35-44: “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away. But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left. Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left. Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come. But know this, that if the goodman of the house had known in what watch the thief would come, he would have watched, and would not have suffered his house to be broken up. Therefore be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh.”
Jesus says “Heaven and earth shall pass away" you say "no, that will not happen Jesus, i know better."
2 Peter 3:3-13: “there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, And saying, Where is the promise of His coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men. But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up. Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness, Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat? Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.”
Peter says “the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up. Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved," you say "no, that will not happen Peter, I know better."
Revelation 20:11-15 – 21:1-5: “And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them. And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire. And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God. And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away (or departed). And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new.”
John says “I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away," you say "no, that will not happen John, I know better."
Amils go with Jesus, Peter and John here rather than you.
Keep in mind, Scott, that the people who invented the "1000 years equals the NT age" theory came up with that theory well before the 1st 1000 years of NT history were completed! Now that 1000 years have passed, not much more can be said for that theory except as a vague kind of symbolism, with the equation: 1000 years symbolically = 2000+ literal years! That's very suspect to me!well makes no sense, it's been 2000 years and Christians worldwide are still being oppressed by the current evil age.