Search results

Without researching this, I would say the NC was a replacement / a better covenant that was originally given to Moses on Mt. Sinai. Since it is a better covenant to His people, I would say it was given to them. Now, the covenant given to Moses was so Israel would learn, study, obey all of God's...

This is how I interpret these verses in Daniel...... for what it is worth. Daniel 7:4-8; 4The first was like a lion, and had eagle’s wings. I watched till its wings were plucked off; and it was lifted up from the earth and made to stand on two feet like a man, and a man’s heart was given to...

Not sure.. but Genesis 3:15 might be the first… ???

I don't want to come across as to push anyone to acquire my commentary on Daniel or accept my interpretations, but I would like to give you folks within this forum a snapshot of the Preface at the beginning of the Book. Even if you do not want to read all of the 398 pages or even most of them...

There is absolutely no doubt that all Gentiles who accept Jesus as their Lord and Savior will enter His Kingdom. But take a look at Jeremiah before the cross - 31“Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah—...

Don't understand this... What do you meant a "spiritual thinking?" The cross was certainly not only physical but more than symbolic. It demonstrates the forgiveness of our sins should we place our faith in the Messiah. The Messiah took on the sin of the world and paid the price of death. But He...

I think the verses in Jeremiah are quite clear.

Part 4. I certainly agree with some of this! But I believe it was the "divided" 4th kingdom of papal Rome that appropriated His church and offered a very different gospel. Their church looked nothing like the church that Paul started. Can you imagine Paul believing that a pope of the 4th...

Part 3. No, please see above. No, and this is one of the most important finds / interpretations within Daniel. Chapter 2:34 and 2:35 are believed by EVERYONE to represent the stone striking the feet of the image and destroying all 4 kingdoms. And this will occur in conjunction with 2:35 at the...

Part 2. Absolutely not. There are very few verses in these chapters that deal with the first 3 kingdoms. The majority of these verses focus on the 4th kingdom of Rome (pagan or papal). In Chapter 11, only verses 1-4 speak of the kingdoms before pagan Rome. However, if you try to match those...

Part 1. I do agree with the historical records that Rome is the 4th kingdom beast. And, it was the kingdom in place at the time of the Messiah. I agree with this. There are perhaps 3 main interpretations on the timing of the start of the prophecy. Two are the different decree's by Artaxerxes...

Thanks.

I know He was but He was our Passover Lamb and would take on the sin of the world and would be considered “unclean” and “ abomination” in Levitical law. Just because it says”end times” does not necessarily mean “true end times.” Just like “tree” does not mean a literal tree all the time. If...

I agree. It was God's prophecy about the restoration of His people and His city back from Babylon. He revealed the start of the 70 weeks of years period, identified the 3 sections of the prophecy and what would be restored in each and by whom, He revealed the timing of His coming on the first...

Thanks. I believe that "today's accepted interpretations" are much closer to your thoughts than mine. I believe the AOD takes place at the time if Christ. From the beginning of the world, God knew that Jesus would go to the cross. And He gave the Israelites the Leviticual Laws that would...

Ok and thanks. Who is your 4th kingdom beast in chapter 2? Isn't that pagan Rome who conquered almos the entire world and was noted for trampling down their enemies and of course used iron in the weapons?

Just wanted to ask some questions regarding these verses in Daniel - I cannot speak at all about Revelation. Can you tell me who this 4th beast kingdom is in your interpretation? In my study, this is pagan Rome who was in power at the time of the arrival of the Messiah in the first century. If...

Romans3:25 1Corinthians 5:7 Ephesians 5:2

Yes they did, and that is only because they rejected their Messiah. ????? Of course He did. He was the Passover Lamb who sacrificed Himself for the sin of the world. Thus, no further sacrifices were necessary. What the non-believers in Jesus and His sacrifice has no bearing on what He...

Thanks. I understand your view.