Search results

Don't be sorry as for me, but be sorry as in: Luke 23:28 I answered that in the post you were replying to. What else have you missed, or passed over? Because Peter was the head--not of the body, but the leader of the disciples whom made up the body, which as Jesus' body, was given charge and...

I wouldn't call it a planned agenda on the part of Satan, but rather an actual divide upon actual lines of belief, as a manifestation against God. We each are born unto ourselves to be what we are as evidence for or against us in the Judgment. This life is each of us dividing ourselves by our...

You (and many) have nearly deciphered the riddle, but not finished, and have thus missed the mark. Alternatively, many have taken a side trip making Peter out to be more than a member of one body where all members are equal, though some may seem to be more important and yet are not. The fact...

The flesh is unto death, but the Spirit unto life. Example: Luke 9:24 (NKJV) For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake will save it. Evil spirits campaign for the flesh. Beware of those who campaign for the glory of the flesh, of which there is...

This is a good word for current world events.

A stone may leave ripples. ;) I guess I'm one of those-- All kidding aside, "He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers," etc. and then there are also many wannabes, and the antis--there's quite a mix. Such is the mix in this world where...

PS, ...and you don't listen very well. Or is it your comprehension?

There are many scientists that believe in God, and perhaps what you have presented would be better said of atheists--but your point is well taken, and much of science is just as you say.

I did not "disagree" with you, nor have I given you anything that is mine against what you have presented, but have only shown you by the scriptures the error of many including yourself. God knows.

No, but you have not fully considered the confusion God intentionally placed upon all language that it should be discerned spiritually, and "you have taken away the key of knowledge. You did not enter in yourself, and those who were entering in you hindered.” The Priests and the Pharisees also...

By that logic Jesus is a baby sheep, and our charge is to light candles and lamps and not put them under a basket...literally. As I said, and Jesus said before, "the words are spirit", and to interpret them literarily is foolishness.

Perhaps I misunderstood you to be speaking against Marty's point as well as Paul's. Now I see why you laughed. My apologies if that is the case! And you are correct--I have not read all the posts in the thread, but was just responding to your response to Marty's OP.

It means there was no matter as yet, and all was spirit...as God is spirit. "Cause" on the other hand is what changed that, and the cause was God, who spoke all things of form and matter into existence.

That is a matter of interpretation of the word as definitive to your own liking, meaning you are simply claiming yours is a better interpretation. Even so, even giving you the benefit of the doubt (which does surely exist with the original word)--your attempt is to take it literally, while the...

Why have you added the above (in red)?

That is not a proper or accurate definition of Preterist beliefs. The Preterists believed that Christ had already returned (past tense) and that it was a done deal, meaning that since then everyone else has missed His return. Paul addressed that, and also explained what is actually true, first...

You're putting the breaks on. "It's enough." I get the hint. It is a shame however. We have gone to the deep end, and you are back peddling. While I have revealed things that have never fully been explained before, you have retreated to what has only been believed based on "opinion." I'm not...

I am not angry. But you are still referring to darkness as light. But what is written--does it not say that this "tent is destroyed", and that there is "no shadow of turning" in the presence of God--meaning no casting of shadows, as is true of the flesh? Did Jesus not cast a shadow after He...

What I say here, I did not learn from men, nor have I spoken what is my own. The history of which began with Peter who did not come by the knowledge of who Christ was by "flesh and blood...but My Father who is in heaven." It is the "same level as Abraham and Jacob", that Jesus has done for all...

When Peter spoke his own opinion, Jesus rebuked him, saying "Satan, get behind Me." But when Peter did not speak his own opinion, but the Holy Spirit spoke through him, it was written as the word of God.