Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. RLT63

    King James Version Only...?

    I don’t speak it either. That’s why I like the NKJV
  2. RLT63

    King James Version Only...?

    I’m sure Jesus speaks all languages. The NT was written in Greek but he didn’t speak in Greek did he?
  3. RLT63

    King James Version Only...?

    Because better source is a matter of opinion. Why not use both? I use the NKJV and the NET. When I was just reading for pleasure I used the NLT. But I was aware that I was reading a paraphrase. I have Interlinear Bibles that have 4 versions side by side. And by clicking a button I can look at...
  4. RLT63

    Oldest and Best, Really??

    I have never read anything in the NKJV that I would consider deleting. Unlike other modern versions they included verses that are in dispute and provided footnotes to explain what was disputed. I don’t think more information is a bad thing.
  5. RLT63

    Oldest and Best, Really??

    Why does it have to be one or the other? Why can’t we like the KJV and the many other translations?
  6. RLT63

    King James Version Only...?

    I’m not a King James Only advocate. They attack me because I prefer the NKJV. They hate that version. And I found The Voice on Bible Gateway. I checked Numbers 5 and it goes with the Biblical abortion narrative. Sorry but I don’t agree. I know it says miscarriage but if I give someone something...
  7. RLT63

    King James Version Only...?

    Textual Criticism is not a game. Here is another place the NIV took great liberties with their translation. There is nothing in the original in Numbers 5 to suggest pregnancy. The NIV turns this passage into a Biblical abortion. Bible Gateway passage: Numbers 5:11-31 - New International Version...
  8. RLT63

    King James Version Only...?

    Verse 7 is the basis for the inclusion of verse 4. I can read it for myself and don’t need some scholar to tell me why it should be excluded. The plain reading of the passage begs for the inclusion of part of verse 3 and all of verse 4 that many translations omit.
  9. RLT63

    King James Version Only...?

    You misunderstand. I think the NKJV is a better translation than the KJV. The 46 paragraphs are about the corrupt Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus that Westcott and Hort favored in their translation. Despite all the documents that have been discovered since their time the Critical Text has...
  10. RLT63

    Oldest and Best, Really??

    Thank you for taking the time to read the article and address it.
  11. RLT63

    have you faced your demons

    Sorry. Not enough information for me to answer . I believe I was oppressed by demons about 15 years ago but God got me through it and has provided for me ever since. He always makes a way and carried me through the worst times. I don’t know if that says you it.
  12. RLT63

    King James Version Only...?

    Yes I’ve read the Wikipedia article before. They make a good case for excluding the verses but there are KJV supporters who make a good case for their inclusion. If you wanted to send a message to North Korea or another hostile country by radio that would reach the people you wouldn’t send one...
  13. RLT63

    Millennialism proven by that man of sin

    That’s not the same as being chained for 1,000 years
  14. RLT63

    King James Version Only...?

    I prefer the versions that leave verse 4 in on this particular passage. This is just one example. See Westcott and Hort's Magic Marker Binge (1/2) and. Westcott and Hort's Magic Marker Binge (2/2)
  15. RLT63

    The Godly Heresy of Sinless Perfectionism

    Thank you. May God bless you and reward you for your convictions.
  16. RLT63

    Oldest and Best, Really??

    https://www.bereanpatriot.com/whats-the-best-bible-translation-and-more-importantly-why/
  17. RLT63

    Millennialism proven by that man of sin

    Like Job? How was Job close to Satan? Or was that before he was chained?
  18. RLT63

    Millennialism proven by that man of sin

    Well if Satan is chained his chain is too long. Just turn on your TV and see for yourself.