Search results

The lamb marries some buildings under your strict interpretation.

As soon as the AC takes power he begins the mark. Thus the slaughter of millions (billions?) of Christians. (the 5 foolish virgins left behind). The great trib Right at the start. Never before has that many believers been exterminated. Jacob's trouble begins. 7 yr great trib right from the start.

Pure baloney. I looked it up and "the" is in there as solid as a rock and used many times. You purposefully misrepresent that? Or did you just assume " the" does not exist in the greek? It is used TWICE in rev 7. The great tribulation. 100% accurate.

Uh, no. I read the word , " the ", to you. If you want to assume it is not there then have at it. You made it pivotal...not me. Your doctrine, as is plain as day, literally depends on the omission of "the".

It says " unless those days were shortened no flesh would be saved". So it is a short period of time...a few years of the worst trib ever in history.

Ahhhh grasshopper , not so. All those in paradise were taken to heaven at Jesus resurrection. Bit no, Jesus framed the great trib as " has never happened and never will". So it is not some assumption of 2000 yrs of trib, but a specific timeframe. You need to factor in more verses before making...

Well, now that we know it really Is "The great" where does that leave your doctrine???? The Greek used "the" twice. Lets see...now under your example of calling everyone a liar...what would that make your entire doctrine?????

Yes indeed I looked it up..rev 7... in the greek. Says THE GREAT.

AHEM, I just looked up that passage in Revelation 7. in the Greek Interlinear. It says ; "...these came out of THE constriction ,THE Great..." What superior interpretation can you add to what the bible plainly says?

That's your assumption. Prove it.

Whether it say Holy Spirit or THE Holy Spirit, it is the same thing. Whether it says Father, or the Father, its talking about the same thing whether it says church, or the church, it is talking about the same thing. It appears you are basing doctrine on a faulty interpretation.

Jesus ministry was of priesthood. That was his earthly ministry.....PRIESTHOOD THE ESTABLISHED PRIESTHOOD UNDER AARON WAS LEVI....NOT JUDAH. Jesus began his. ministry AFTER his baptism. A levitical priest entered his office via baptism. A levitacal priest baptized Jesus into HIS MINISTRY...

Rev 7 9 After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before the throne, and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands; Not limited area. All nations. All that came out if the...

No I told you it changed at His baptism. The veil was torn years later. I have never believed the priesthood changed at the veil being torn. We are most likely misunderstanding each other. Maybe we are on the same page and I am not conveying my position well.

It is like you are trying too make a case against the obvious. Your position is that the great multitude can not possibly be from the great tribulation. 1) they had dirty robes that had to be washed. 2) it says in rev 7 15 Therefore are they before the throne of God, and serve him day and...

you do not know where rev 5 is? You have never read rev 5 where the son takes the scroll from the Father and opens seals? I am not here to convince you of anything. I am here to report the Word. You can go against it. You can refute what I am reading.

1) If the AC has limited scope then the multitude without number COULD be numbered. It would be a million or so martyred. 2) it says every man, woman, and child takes The mark. That is worldwide. 3) with today's technology and a possible reward on turning in Christians, none of you stand a...

1) I never said any of that 2) I was telling YOU the priesthood changed at Jesus baptism, not at the torn veil.( veil torn indicating the priesthood changed)... 3) the veil was torn indicating many dynamics. 4) no, Jesus de-ligitimized the levitical priesthood in his earthly ministry. Over and...

sounds plausible

No way . Way off Jesus was of Judah/ david. Only levitical priests were in existence. David was the forerunner of Jesus.( judah) John TB was of Levi. He was in fact the legit priest. Annas and Ciaphus were Roman appointees. The priesthood changed at Je,sus baptism. That is WHY the veil was...