Search results

The only Rapture that I see during the trib is revelation 14:14. That is a gathering of the Jews. But the one in Luke 17 and the one in Matthew 24 have the exact same setting, and they have the same Dynamic of one's taken and one is left. So it pretty much has to be a pre-trib rapture in both...

Over and over you post that Jesus comes after The trib. Yep You post that angels gather after THE trib Yep You post that angels gather from heaven Yep. All that is after The trib Yep Then you post, that in your mind, against the facts of those verses, that the rapture , a gathering FROM EARTH...

you would need to actually address the verses, not omit them. Omit means to leave out. Or skip Or hide Ignore them is your strategy. You just proved how you miss the target, then celebrate your ignoring of Gods word. I just told you you can not unpack them Then you demonstrated that very thing...

What interlinear do you use?

Ok this is what I suspected. Alexandrian text. Yes indeed. A corrupted text. I knew you were defending that corrupt text. Just wanted you to admit it.

Can you point me to an example.

YOU got any relevant questions.?

Spyder and Jane. Okay here's the thing . I don't know of anything or anywhere in strongs or the King James where some Doctrine is protected and therefore the word of God is somehow corrupted. You both leave out the leading of the Holy Spirit. Another thing I'd like to comment on is that Chuck...

yes, but they are alluding to "older texts" therefore "better"...(even though they are corrupted.) A simple question, they can not answer. Tells me right there they do not know what they are talking about.

YES It stands to reason that they are drawn to the inferior texts that leave out entire verses. They actually like and defend those modern bibles. Actually brag about the omissions.

apply vs 38 to the verse that says "after the tribulation"..which is the second coming. Show me how those 2 verses are the same coming. Because "after the tribulation" is the second coming which would be "after the flood" See what I mean? Some are trying to say there is no difference. So they...

Questions to the superior minds here; These supposed texts that are superior to the textus receptus, can any of you name them?

websters; FORNICA'TION, noun [Latin fornicatio.] 1. The incontinence or lewdness of unmarried persons Any questions?

..still can not say what your superior text is????? Hmmmmmm Just humor this dummy.

You have proven you have no case at all trying to make the word "fornicate" into some milestone that leads millions down a path of sin, that they would not have taken, had they only known "fornicate" is your theory of a bad translation. You need to do better than that. You have actually proven...

SUB'STANCE, noun [Latin substantia, substo; sub and sto, to stand.] 1. In a general sense, being; something existing by itself; that which really is or exists; equally applicable to matter or spirit. Thus the soul of man is called an immaterial substance a cogitative substance a substance...

AHEM; FORNICA'TION, noun [Latin fornicatio.] 1. The incontinence or lewdness of unmarried persons, male or female; also, the criminal conversation of a married man with an unmarried woman.

you apparently can not name your superior greek text.

FORNICA'TION, noun [Latin fornicatio.] 1. The incontinence or lewdness of unmarried persons, male or female; also, the criminal conversation of a married man with an unmarried woman. 2. Adultery. Matthew 5:32. 3. Incest. 1 Corinthians 5:1. 4. Idolatry; a forsaking of the true God, and...

FORNICA'TION, noun [Latin fornicatio.] 1. The incontinence or lewdness of unmarried persons, male or female; also, the criminal conversation of a married man with an unmarried woman. 2. Adultery. Matthew 5:32. 3. Incest. 1 Corinthians 5:1. 4. Idolatry; a forsaking of the true God, and...