Search results

You did it again, not quoting Acts 2:38. We need to enroll you into Acts Skippers Anonymous and secretly baptize you in the name of Jesus for the remission of your sins.

You are an Acts skipper, because you REFUSE to obey Acts 2:38. You are not of the 3000 at Pentecost. You are of the RCC and her Acts skipping protestant daughters. The RCC invented Acts skipping by disobeying Acts 2:38, and all her modern, Acts skipping protestant daughters perfected the...

38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. 11 And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord...

Grace. I am glad God gave us this method to find remission of sins and sanctification of spirit.

Amen

Acts 2:38 is Grace. Another Acts skipper false idea is that Spirit led works are the works mentioned by Paul that do not save us. Paul mentions the "works of the Law". Acts skippers call every Spirit led and required work, "works". These phonies are hyocritical because confessing Jesus is a...

If the name of Jesus was not spoken over you upon immersion during baptism, you are officially unqualified to read and apply the Epistles. You have zero foundation.

It is impossible to be an Epistle skipper if you obey Acts 2:38. After obeying Acts 2:38, you become qualified to read and apply the Epistles. The Acts skipper "qualifies" sinners illegally by taking sinners straight to the letters written to the previously saved via Acts 2:38, saints. He is...

The introduction to salvation in Acts, is in Acts 2:38. It never changed. The rest must point back to Acts 2:38, not point away from it. I think you know you are pitting verses against it because you haven't taken a bath in your life and are terrified to get immersed because you can't swim...

You are 100% right!

You did it again. You skipped Acts. You are brain trained to do that.

No, here's what you Acts skippers teach.... "Baptism was in the name of Jesus for the remission of sins specifically in Acts 2, but Peter forgot to mention the remission of sins part during commanding it in Acts 10, so it dropped off". No kidding, Acts skippers are that dense.

I do my best to stay out of political rants but sometimes I let Tucker Carlson get the best of me.:eek:

1 Cor 6:11 speaks of 2 entities...divided by the word "and'. this is baptismal washing(sanctification in the name of Jesus).... AND.... Spirit filling. You see it too. Good. This has nothing to do with "Godhead".

No, Matt 28 and Mark 16 are the same event(along with Luke 24). The Lord was not reenacting the event in 3 of the 4 gospels, 3 different times. He did not ascend 3 times. Get it together over there.

The Spirit leads and guides into further truth. The Spirit is not given to vindicate lifestyles and beliefs. Acts skippers get the Holy Ghost and continue the same crazy beliefs that they previously had and the Spirit can't budge them towards Acts 2:38. Weird days we are living in.

Acts skippers indeed forbid water and command folks NOT to be baptized in the name of the Lord. They are in an alternate universe.

Exactly when were the 3000 simultaneously and instantly alive spiritually in the passage?... 36 Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made the same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ. 37 Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart...

My enemy is the devil and his minions that let him mess with our Bibles. I am not very political, but very into scriptural order.

How silly. The murderers of Jesus in Acts 2 were commanded to be baptized in the name of Jesus for the remission of their sins before recieving the Holy Ghost and the gentiles in Acts 10 were commanded baptism in the name of Jesus after recieving the Holy Ghost. What's the difference as long...