Search results

Absolutely 100% in the context of naming individuals. I've already shown all that. God brings every individual soul to him. The language allows no other legitimate interpretation. What he calls them, that is their name. Individuals. The language gives no room for any other interpretation...

I thought Pilate was damned until I read what the early church thought of him. They changed my mind.

Genesis 1:27 So God created man in His [own] image, in the image of God created He him; male and female created He them. "female" there is 'neqebah' Adam named his wife 'Ishshah' in Genesis 2:23 Context, language and correlation with the rest of scripture all dictate that. I am not aware why...

WOW. Dude, you are so far from being right it's not even funny. Mary has every right to fellowship with us and discuss the scripture like any Christian does. There are plenty of deceived men going around acting like teachers; I advise you spend your efforts on them. She hasn't been pretending...

@Marymog See here is one of those examples that we could spend a lifetime trying to understand and only manage to begin

Your private opinion is 100% in conflict with scripture, absolutely ignoring context, ignoring correlation, and ignoring the language, and utterly incapable of conformance to John 5:39, Luke 24 & Galatians 4. See Isaiah 56:5, 62:2; Revelation 2:17, 3:12, and pray God will open your understanding.

You are right that this is a deeper question - I put the question about the new name of the bride of the first Adam specifically because it's a relatively easy/simple question. The real question there is why did God create Adam "alone" ((what's God's definition of alone?)) since He is...

"ha hahaha hahaha"

Genesis 2:19 And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought [them] unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that [was] the name thereof. Take up your argument with God. I have no idea...

Look at the text. Genesis 2:19 YLT And Jehovah God formeth from the ground every beast of the field, and every fowl of the heavens, and bringeth in unto the man, to see what he doth call it; and whatever the man calleth a nephesh chayya, that is its name. those words for the living souls are...

No, you pretended v.19 didn't exist, ignoring the context and the correlation, because you are only interested in your own vanity and in arguments, not in the truth. What you did is you established that you aren't worth me taking the time to talk to. You aren't ready for meat. You're still...

look m8, whatever Adam called it, that was its name. Adam called her Woman. That is her name. Do you deny that? That's what scripture says. that's the context and the literal linguistic record. Throughout the narrative she's called ha-ishi just like ha-adam. It's her name. Definite article...

Hello again Mary, First of all, yay! Someone who isn't attacking me! Second of all, No, I do not. My point was that neither the RCC not 'the church' in the larger sense ((like the actual definition of the word 'catholic')) has actually solved everything; this is illustrative of it...

Again, Adam named every living soul. It went like this: God brought them to him, and whatever he called ((kawraw)) them, that was their name ((shem)) . God's word. God brought Adam's wife to him, he called her 'Woman' and that was her name.

See verse 19. Adam names every single living soul. God brings them to him, he names them, whatever he "calls them" is their name. God brings Adam's wife to him. He calls her Woman. That is her name.

Previously discussed. See post #164

the Author of scripture did. i.e. God said so. Genesis 2:23 She shall be called Woman That's a name. Adam named every living soul apart from himself in the creation ((v. 19)). Naming living souls is kind of his 'thing' Genesis 3:20 Adam called his wife's name Eve That's explicitly a name...

you called them "detailed" perhaps it wasn't quite the right descriptor

no. what you replied to was me asking whether you had insight on the antetype of the choosing of Paul, since you indicated you were an accomplished student of Paul. you answered my question, which was a legitimate question about studying scripture, by calling it "meaningless, non value add...

i was told "The Church" has already figured everything out. do you disagree with that statement? i'm not sure i agree with it either, myself.