Search results

So do you think that someone could take the literal mark and John 3:16 wouldn't apply to them?

Yes but I do believe that the sea beast was Rome and the land beast was apostate Israel

Yes it happened at that time

Sorry but i'm not quite sure what you mean

How can they be the same event when one is the defeat of Babylon the great by the beast and the other is the defeat of the beast and the false prophet by Jesus?

I didn’t say satan I said the beast Revelation 17:16-17 16 The beast and the ten horns you saw will hate the prostitute. They will bring her to ruin and leave her naked;they will eat her flesh and burn her with fire. 17 For God has put it into their hearts to accomplish his purpose by...

Nice one

The wedding Revelation 19 clearly shows that the wedding supper happens after Babylon the great is destroyed before the beast is destroyed and revelation 20 clearly shows that the coming with fire is after the thousand years. Remember revelation 17 shows us that it is the beast who destroyed...

Who would the Jews living in the time of Antiochus Epehanies though that Daniel was talking to in the 70 weeks?

The message of the 70 weeks was an answer to the prayer Daniel was praying because Jeremiahs 70 years were ending and the people hadn’t repeated. Thus the 70 years became 70 weeks of years. Jesus nor any New Testament writer ever claimed that Jesus fulfilled any of the 70 weeks

John 3:16 can’t stand if people can’t repent of the mark if the mark is a literal mark

How can they be the same event when one is the defeat of Babylon the great by the beast and the other is the defeat of the beast and the false prophet by Jesus?

We need to think what was the reason for the 70 weeks why was Daniel praying in the first part of Daniel chapter 9?

How does that fit the biblical descriptions of the false prophet? A false prophet would come from the same people as the true prophets. The land beast is the only beast in the bible described as a clean animal which would represent Israel as the gentile nations have biblical descriptions of...

Sorry but I’m not quite sure what you mean

Sure there are but what about my last three points?

I used sound doctrine in my post. The sword is symbolic for Jesus word not a literal sword and not just one time like in the verse below Revelation 2:16 16 Repent therefore! Otherwise, I will soon come to you and will fight against them with the sword of my mouth. The 200 mile long river of...

The bible says so Rev19:19 19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to wage war against the rider on the horse and his army. Im sure if it’s in the future the beast would know what’s written in the bible Its not the battle of Armageddon the world...

There is a general belief that Revelation chapter 19 is the second coming when Jesus literally rides down from heaven on his white horse and destroys all of his enemies with His armies but is this what the text actually says? There are three messages in this chapter which is for the seven...

Amen