Search results

@RR144 @Pierac Here are the exceptions: Matthew 13:38 The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one. John 17:12 While I was with them in the world, I kept them in Your name. Those whom You gave Me I have kept; and...

No, but I have confirmed it.

This is the result of the foretold and fulfilled prophecy from Joel at Pentecost (promised by Jesus, and confirmed by Peter) of God pouring out His spirit upon "all" flesh-- that is, on both the good and the evil. This is the act of Christ, by namesake, "the End." "Then comes the end."

You say "we don't know"-- But I know. What you have described is not the case. I could tell you the truth and have not hid it and openly stated it, but it has been rejected. Now then, we move forward. Thus comes the small scale (worldly) enactment of what is occurring in heaven, the...

None. But He does let them touch the stove if they stomp their feet and insist.

God does not send His children to eternal suffering. He only sends those children of Satan, after first offering them adoption, if they refuse and insist on staying with their own father.

You have been found naked, and repeatedly want to take away my tunic, so I have repeatedly offered you my cloak also, but you have repeatedly rejected it. It is enough.

You are presuming to know what I have been saying as if to rewrite it in your own way. But you have not presumed correctly, so I am not going to continue this way. One little point at a time, one baby step.

You are rattling on again. Try to be more concise. I explained scripture not being enough and God's confusing of "all" language, as the Bible does. You obviously just don't believe it. Do I really need to remind you that the scriptures also repeat the reality that people hear and see and read...

I said "would-be resurrection, because there is no resurrection of the flesh except for "we who are alive and remain" in the world until we too ascend. Which resurrection is not for the flesh which only remains until it returns to the dust. But it is rather the spirit which is life, even...

You marvel seemingly in unbelief, but what I have been describing is written, as he who "set his right foot on the sea and his left foot on the land", which is the one in heaven and the other on the earth. This is also what is meant by "for me, to live is Christ." "For indeed, the kingdom of...

Sad that it "seems" that way to you. You apparently are of the same mind as the teacher, not even knowing that the term "sextual" meaning: having or involving sex. Anyone who understood and actually had something other than sex in mind would have used another word...like "love", or "romance"...

This is the typical misunderstanding. This life is your ticket out, a gift from God should you choose to receive it. It is also the manifestation of who and what you really are--what we all are and were. You are no different. But yes, there are those who seem to get away with whatever and live...

The church is far from perfect, but the words are not from the church, but from God. You are not describing the circumstances correctly at all. God has been challenged by a liar and murderer. If someone came in your house and began murdering your children--what-- would you love them and let...

Only if taken out of context. There are also countless verses that demonstrate many will not be saved. The whole context includes both saved and unsaved.

I just have to quote you saying "sexual doesn't have to actually include sex." This is the world we live in folks--people don't even know they are lying when they do it--but there it is!

If that was actually the case...the teacher was wrong by definition to call it "sexual."

Wow!

You mean, as plural?

You mock the unseen Spirit, equating Him with "Metaphysical Mystical Gobbly Goop", and spew hatred toward what you do not understand. Go ahead, keep it up. "There will be weeping and gnashing of teeth."