Search results

Which history book? Curious Mary

Disgusting Troll

Yup, you are right Pierac. That is what I said. I understand how you took it. It was poor wording on my part. Looking back on other posts of yours, not just to me, I see that being condescending IS who you are. I will consider that on our future communications and try not to be offended. None...

You are a fascinating person EG. You allege that Ziggy said the exact same thing I said. You then post your "evidence" which shows that once again....well, I can't call you a liar.....It shows once again that you are not an honest person. Here is what Marymog said: Jesus was a teacher of the...

Thank you for posting the opinions of GOTQUESTIONS.ORG. I am sure the founder of GOTQUESTIONS.ORG, S. Michael Houdmann, is probably a good man. If I were to sit at a dinner table with him he would probably be a very likeable guy. Help me out here: Why do you follow S. Michael Houdmann? Have...

Ummm....The Church nor any Christian history book that I have read claims that "the Roman Catholic Church" started in year 1 OR AD 30 after He ascended. The Church doesn't even call itself the Roman Catholic Church. That is what you Protestants call it. Soooooo I have to agree with you, what...

No BlessedPeace, a sermon by a Pope does not qualify as "Official church teaching". If Pope Francis were to give a sermon at the Vatican TODAY and he said in that sermon baptism is not necessary, Church teaching (doctrine/dogma) would not change! If you would teach yourself about your own...

hey BlessedPeace, Look up the dictionary definition of ilk. In other posts I say "me and my ilk". Am I showing contempt for myself when I say that? :watching and waiting: I get it. You WANT to be offended and you think I am attacking you personally...... so that is how you read my posts. No...

Huh? Learner, I'm a little slow sometimes. What are you saying here? I'm not sure if I should laugh or quote Scripture.....:doldrums: Curious Mary

I already debunked this..........

According to YOUR interpretation..........

QUOTES (plural) FROM YOU: Again, we are discussing John 6. But I am focusing on John 6 here.. can you do this. Can we please stick to what jesus said in John 6. Again, Do not go to another passage to explain this.. But lets first discuss John 6

Nope EG, I never said that. Here is what YOU said: POST #238: I opened this thread to show that John 6 is not so hard to understand that we do not need to have teachers explain it to us. That we can understand ourselves. If we just listen.

Nope EG, I believe I made it very clear what I was saying. I NEVER said the bible was not written for us in the 21st century. YOU added that to what I said. :watching and waiting: FACT: 1 John is a letter to the Churches in the time he wrote them. So YOU, in 1 John, are the Churches in the 1st...

QUOTES (plural) FROM YOU: Again, we are discussing John 6. But I am focusing on John 6 here.. can you do this. Can we please stick to what jesus said in John 6. Again, Do not go to another passage to explain this.. But lets first discuss John 6 CC: @Nancy

No, I do not think God is a man and had sex with Mary. It's obvious you can't see that I am portraying what your Protestant men have taught YOU, not telling you what I believe. I can see that you are unable to grasp this conversation AND you are a very condescending person. Mary

In john 6 Jesus told his disciples that we must eat Him. However, he had yet to show them how to eat him. He did this at the Last Supper. Paul then re-affirmed what Jesus said about the last supper. to be continued...the plot thickens.

No problem. It is getting close to dinner time and I work this weekend so I won't get back to you until monday. Yes, ALL of Scripture includes OT and NT. I will use both to talke about the Bread Jesus spoke of in John 6.....

Thank you. Much better than my conversation with EG. When Scripture mentions bread we can not and should not look at that one passage and try to figure out what it means. It has to be taken into context of ALL of Scripture. Does that make sense? Do you disagree with that use of hermenutics? Mary

Very good question. Thank you. Some of it may be relevant today, but that would have to be looked at vs by vs.