Search results

no its the trinity three gods, that they dont accept. when Jesus and the12 were teaching Jews, with the exception of the priest leadership who were corrupt, Herodeans, and made up only a teeny tiny bit of "the Jews", had no problem with what Jesus taught. in in greatest commandment Jesus even...

im not an expert on "isms" but i do know that three gods is not the way Jesus worshiped. exctly, "He" is one, never "they" are one. three persons are "they" the 12 baptized in the name of Jesus. three is three, one is one, they teach you that in grade school. Jesus said He never did anything...

Never! Not in a thousand years did the protestants ever do wrong, I am baptist so this is what I think and any evidence provided I just ignore. See how foolish that is? I would hate to be someone that thought like that. Of course they did wrong, the scribe demon I mentioned earlier was mostly...

Another interesting fact, back in the day when the clergy were always copying and translating they would often make mistakes but unlike honest men that follow Jesus and admit their mistakes, they would refuse out of arrogance and pride, therefore they invented their own demon called titivillus...

They did on the orders of the church, so either way the church is guilty. Heresy by definition is teaching or doing anything the church says not to. And the guys that made up these rules were some of the most corrupt people ever

No one believes that outside of your little twilight zone world. Secular courts don't try people for heresy

Where does the bible teach that one?

another point that trinns cant refute, the Most High is always referred to as "He" and "I", never "they". if the "us" in Gen is the Most High talking to Himself like trins teach, then why did Jesus not talk to Himself like this? even when He prayed it was always to the Father, never to Himself.

there are so many bible passages that debunk the trinity. IMO one of the best is Mark 12 when Jesus is teaching on the greatest command. at the end the scribe is talking about how important the oneness of the Most High is. now trins will say they believe the Most High is one, you know the old...

the story of Joan of Arc is interested. she lead an army and won many battles. but the the idea of a women leading troops was to much for the church, they had her burned alive. and what was her shocking crime, she wore mens clothes. im not kidding, this innocent heroic lady was but to death...

The church conquered rome? The greatest empire ever with the biggest army and a few little sects took them down? What are you smoking? The idea that rome was assimilated into Christianity is laughable. You can bring out your "keys of Peter" all you like but we all know that after edict of milan...

now that people are free to choose and are not killed or thrown in jail for not accepting the trinity, the non trin churches seem to be growing a lot. its sad you gotta have an army to enforce church doctrine on the people. not the way of Jesus at all.

but rome is the one that killed Christ. its strange that rome can kill Jesus, make a church and then tell people they are the church and people really buy into it.

see what i mean. there is no scripture that says "plainly" Jesus is the Most High. like i said, you guys ignore scripture and put your doctrines first. if it was taught plainly in scripture the church would not have had to burn alive thousands and thousands of innocent people to force them...

it makes no difference if its in the bible, they dont care, they hold the manmade doctrines above the bible. then they rearrange the bible to fit the doctrine. Jesus says the Father is greater. trins say this is Jesus nature one talking to Jesus nature two, which is absurd, whats even worse is...

substantiate means support. but i dont think you made a mistake, i am starting to believe this is how you follow the bible, everything is opposite, or backward. bible says do not steal, you would teach people its ok to steal. like i said, no matter how much evidence is provided, no matter what...

even if? you see this is your problem, all the evidence on planet earth says he was, and your reaction is "even if" as if you think this information is just made up. if i had a time machine, we went back and caught him in the act, you would still be there saying "its not what it looks like". it...

the Most High commanding verbatim He is not a man, He is not a son of man. plus a whole mountain of others. you have been shown these things before, you will only ignore them. you have no interest in truth or the scripture, you place manmade doctrine first and turn scripture aside to make the...

sound doctrine means it is supported by scripture. HU contradicts scripture making it UNsound doctrine

Does anyone know anyone directly that have died from corona? Not a friend of a friend but family, friend, co-worker etc. Zero for me