Search results

None of us can lead a sinless life - and God knows we cannot lead a sinless life. That’s why He inspired John to write, “If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us” (1John 1:8). But God, in his loving mercy and through Christ, has given us a way out of our sin...

In the NT letters, there are many admonishments against various kinds of sins, which are in effect Christ’s “Thou shalt not …” commandments. Here are a few examples: “For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which...

You need to distinguish between the sins and mistakes of individual Catholics in the past and what the Catholic Church actually teaches. Which Catholic doctrine says non-Catholics must be put to death? … which proves except Catholics are sinners too, just like everyone else.

Really? That’s news to me. If there are “many” Catholics who believe Mary is part of the Trinity, you shouldn’t have any trouble citing one. So go ahead. Demonstrate that you are not talking rubbish.///////////Furthermore, any “Catholic” who believes Mary is part to the Trinity is a...

Is it Christian to spread lies about the Catholic Church, like you do?

Er, no ... you missed the point:. 1John 5:16 says there are sins that are "not deadly" and there are sins that are "deadly". So there are two categories of sin. Please explain. Which sins are "not deadly"? Which sins are "deadly"?

There are former Christian ministers who are now atheists - are they still "sealed" by the HS? Reading Scriptures literally that obviously are not meant to be read literally leads to bad theology. The "partakers of the HS" in Heb 6:4 fell away and weren't saved - what happened to their "seal"?

Good grief, you're as gullible, naive and clueless as a child. If you had any sense, you'd check out any such claims to access their veracity ... But no, you just swallow these lies hook, line and sinker, like a fool. Then you mindlessly regurgitate them, like a fool. You're not the sharpest...

The Church you malign as "antichrist" and "harlot" gave you the Scriptures that you put all your trust in. That's so funny!

Where does Scripture explain what the "deadly" and non-"deadly" sins (1John 5:16) are? Can you list them? And what does "deadly" mean in this context?

Pray tell, which speech of Pope John Paul II incited Catholics in Sth America to attack Protestants churches? Some details, please. Otherwise, I'll have no choice but to conclude that you're either a fool who will believe anything, or bs-artist who spreads lies.

You appear to given up trying to answer my questions - probably because you can't and I've exposed flaws in your false doctrines. Instead of admitting defeat, you've resorted to posting senseless drivel. I get the message.

Nowhere does it say the seal of the Holy Spirit cannot be broken (read Heb 6:4-6). If you lose your faith, will you still be "sealed"? If you commit "deadly" sins (1John 5), will you still be sealed? That word "seal" can also be translated as "mark" - you've assumed it is automatically...

The seal of the Holy Spirit can be broken. Your eternal fate is not "sealed" until you die and are judged by Christ.

I'm sure that I'll go to place where there is no coronavirus.

You can't answer my question, so you may well repeat something moronic.

Surprise, surprise ... when it comes to providing evidence of your idiotic claim, you can't. What a joke.

You could begin your own church, based on what you think are Bible doctrines, and so could any other believer, but there would be points of difference between your church’s doctrines and the doctrines of another church. So which church do I accept has the correct doctrines - yours or someone...

What you call “facts” are what I call “idiotic fantasies from over-active imaginations”. Actually, there is nothing wrong with adopting certain pagan customs and reassigning them with a Christian meaning. The missionaries who worked in pagan lands understood the value of this approach to...

You missed it. Jesus said “call NO MAN your father ON EARTH”. So according to your literal interpretation of the verse, NO MAN ON EARTH can be called father - which included one’s own biological father, does it not?