Search results

Prove that. Why is it the case? Does this mean you think the Scripture is not decisive one way or the other? The Scripture alone not being decisive one way or another I can understand, the word "firstborn" does not necessarily mean there were children after, the word "brothers and sisters" does...

All assertions with no proof.

What on Earth do you mean by "one being"? Jack and Jill have one nature together and are two persons. Their nature (what they are) is one yet they are two hypostases (persons) by which we can name them "Jack and Jill." So when we say God the Father and His Word "went up the hill"...

Amen. And considering that death is simply the severing of the soul from the body, and not cessation of existence, I fail to understand the controversy about saying "God died." It says more about the influence of godless philosophy than about God to me when Christians of all people take offense...

Do a word study on heos and see the absurdity introduced by this sort of reading.

In my defense, I say the same. God bless.

Bible truth of what? I also do not acknowledge that dichotomy. I wouldn't be in the Church I am in if I did not think it was in accord with what the Lord taught. Any sect with errors of that level is not with God.

Are you looking for more?

Answering sentences in the order quoted above: According to the Scripture Mary is His mother. Matthew 1:16, 1:18, 1:25, 2:11, 2:13, 2:14, 2:20, 2:21 and onwards. Unless you would impute error to St. Matthew, St. Joseph, and St. Gabriel, the Prophet, and the angels, it is proper to say that Mary...

See [Song lyric rhymed "deity" with "see it free" so that is the strange connection that came to me.]

This guy is a false teacher and a blasphemer. May the Lord draw out all those who follow him and may the Lord rebuke him. His interpretation is not valid. Anathemas are given by the Church and those who rule it under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, those with the Office, but he is not one...

He was not but he is part of the 12, the St. Paul is another Apostle/Prophet called by Jesus personally who had equal dignity with them, but Jesus didn't make him part of the 12, which Judas was part of and then replaced by St. Matthias.

Sirach 15:11-20 refutes the whole thesis by itself, so does the Gospels, Torah, and rest of the Holy Scriptures: "Say not: It is through God, that she is not with me: for do not thou the things that he hateth. Say not: He hath caused me to err: for he hath no need of wicked men. The Lord hateth...

It does not make her what God is to say that she is the Mother of the Second Person of the Trinity.

Just because it's possible doesn't mean it is actual in any one individual. This is why we have the Psalms, the Church, and many other sources of grace, for it is still difficult to accept. Some Saint said if a person could entirely and without wavering follow God's will for a single day they...

Yes, and by the latter we will become the former, I am saying it is possible to be perfect by God's divinizing grace.

All who are saved will be divinized (2 Peter 2:4), so we will be perfected. There have been a few who nearly got there in this life or who did receive it, so it is not impossible. All fall short or have fallen short, but in Christ all things are possible should God allow it.

The world, the flesh, and the devils get at us. The depth of sin and death already in us is immense to where even the just man falls seven times a day. If you aren't living a sinless life you aren't living a "good" life, it is still bad. It seems you have lowered the bar in this post to call it...

St. Matthias took the place of Judas, see Acts.

Nous of Christ.