Search results

so we have one passage that says your way, and the passage in question has a very checkered past. and we have my way, supported by many many many many scriptures, not one of those with baggage of controversy and they all sync perfect with the rest of scripture. and you pick the option with...

were they "all" disturbed??? so if we understand this a certain way it means we can change the meaning of passages such as: Acts 2:38 And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of...

and i simply accept what it says, you do not Acts 2:38 And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

from the bible: Acts 2:38 And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

what i presented did not contradict scripture

when Jesus says Son of the Most High i accept it just fine, you reject it and place your manmade theology above His words. i have already explained the Isiah passage are you your own father? we know you will not answer but seriously, this is the logic of your idea. i have taken on and...

and one of those many things they say is baptize in the name of Jesus, something you teach people not to do.

This is what Eusebius wrote on Mt 28 19 With one word and voice He said to His disciples: “Go, and make disciples of all nations in My Name, teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you,” — (Proof of the Gospel by Eusebius, Book III, ch 6, 132 (a), p. 152) this guy lived...

there are a few on this thread that disagree with the way the apostles baptized.

no they say all those passages are incorrect, i guess they know better than the ones trained by Jesus.

bible says name of Jesus, i support this, why would i be embarrassed? i would only be embarrassed if i made some wild crazy claim such as we did NOT baptize in this way, but who would make such a statement that contradicted the bible . . . . lol

the religion of Jesus, ummm ok? passage still says name of Jesus, you need to get a big black marker and start buying up bibles so you can black out those passages

scripture says name of Jesus

but you said we do not baptize in the name of Jesus? which is it?

and more examples of how the Apostles, the ones trained by Jesus Himself, practiced baptism. Acts 19:5 On hearing this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. hard to believe there are people that reject these passages.

ohh ok so all of this changes this: Acts 10 48 And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they asked him to remain for some days. basically this passage is wrong now? now the apostles trained by Jesus Himself did not baptize in the name of Jesus. now they baptize...

i think its pretty shameful they way they are treating Margaret Court. i have always liked tennis, i have also noticed womens tennis has been associated with lesbians. i remember Martina Navratilova being a lesbian but i dont remember any others?

more examples of how the ones trained by Jesus baptized: Acts 10 48 And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they asked him to remain for some days.

they did NOT baptize in the name of Jesus? Acts 2:38 And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. so whats the deal with this passage?

of course there are those that dont accept the mountain of evidence, but those that refuse to acknowledge what is standing right in front of them are rarely taken seriously.