Search results

You presented what the modern translations have, but not what the Traditional translation have, which are the missing Scriptures.

Even 1 manuscript would be enough, but there are always at least a few. The modern translations use only 2 manuscript copies, because they are the oldest. The Traditional translation uses 3000 plus manuscript copies.

It's verse 37 that is entirely omitted. Also, the foot notes don't mean much when they try to explain why they didn't include Scripture. They usually just say that "some manuscripts say," as if there weren't enough manuscript evidence. It could be 1 or two manuscripts, it doesn't matter how...

"Incarnate" means to be born in the flesh. I agree on this one. God, which is the Father did not come but sent His Son, Who is as the Father in what He said and did for the Father, for They are one in everything ("These Three are One" 1Jn 5:7). God saw it was a greater sacrifice to send His Son...

The NKJV is best of all for reading and it contain the entirety of God's Word, which the detractors of the modern translations cannot claim. They are missing hundreds of phrases and some omit entire passages, few of which I have shown in post #67.

But these are Three separate Deities representing a triune God. "These Three are One" means they all are in one accord or in agreement.

Though there are times when there may be only a few manuscript evidence of a passage, it doesn't matter how many manuscripts that do not have a certain reading. If you think the number of manuscripts matter, then the detractors have only 2 primary manuscripts--the Vaticanus (codex B) and the...

What do you mean by "one God formula?"

All translations have to use many words that were not found in the manuscripts (the translation isn't perfect but the Word of God in it is). The King James translators were laborious enough to indicate to the reader what were not in the manuscripts by italicization. A highly significant advantage!

Many the omissions are due to the Gnostic writers of these manuscripts attempts to distort the Deity of Christ, e.g. discredits to Christ's omnipresence: the phrase "even the Son of man which is in heaven," showing He's present in heaven while on the earth, is omitted. Eph 3:9 omits "who...

Evidentially there was enough Greek manuscripts to include the "Johannine Comma" by the KJV translators, because none of it is italicized. You may know that these translators used italics to identify words not found in the manuscripts. It is so the translators could not be accused of trying to...

"God" is correctly used in the translation, for it is the Greek word "theos." If one doesn't truly know that Christ, the Son of God did not came in the flesh, he is an antichrist (not suspecting you of course, unless you don't believe this truth -1Jo 4:3; 2Jo 1:7).

Evidentially there was enough Greek manuscripts to include the "Johannine Comma" by the KJV translators, because none of it is italicized. You may know that these translators used italics to identify words not found in the manuscripts. It is so the translators could not be accused of trying to...

Evidentially there was enough Greek manuscripts to include the "Johannine Comma" by the KJV translators, because none of it is italicized. You may know that these translators used italics to identify words not found in the manuscripts. It is so the translators could not be accused of trying to...

I agree with much of your reply, but it's my opinion that one will not grow as much reading translations that mix true Scripture with the false readings, and esp. the omitted Scriptures; of which there are hundreds. For thirty years of my 47 years of studying the Bible I use to mark where I left...

I'm finding more all the time that many Christians are not concerned with translations that change and omits Scripture. That's because many Christians do not read the Word much.

Regardless Brother, I find more security in translations that use the Majority Text for the translation. It consists of three-thousand plus manuscripts, as opposed to the detractors three, but mainly two manuscripts, which were written by Gnostics and is why many of the hundreds of omitted...

"God was manifest in the flesh" by natural birth (1Ti 3:16). "Manifested" here means Jesus was a presentation (not the Father Himself) of the Father as if it were the Father Himself. This is the truth of what is meant by Col 2:9: "For in Him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily." He...

Of course the detractors will make false accusations. It's the Majority Text in question, which consists of three-thousand plus manuscript copies, against two false witnesses, namely the Vaticanus and the Sianiticus manuscripts. Two (and sometimes three with the Alaxandrinus, which is very...

Using the Blue Letter Bible shows all the comparisons at the little window to the right after you do a search. You can change it to any translation to see the comparison. Let me know if you have have problems doing this.