Search results

What verse are you referring to!

No reason for this thought to even be there!

What does what have to do with Jn 20?

But the interpolation says something that is not even in character. Saying that He did not consider it an advantage to be grasped has nothing to do with the text. No idea where that cam from. It's a scholar's fancy and whim!

Not sure what versions you're talking about, but 10 of the most popular modern translations interpolated it. NLT NIV ESV CSB NASB20 NASB95 LSB NET RSV ASV The omissions are the worse offense, but interpolating and transposing result in a different meaning and thought; of which there are many.

Thanks for the support, and God bless!

Bearing in mind these characteristic differences between the Jewish camp and the Christian company, we can easily test the great religious systems of Christendom. Do these systems bear the characteristics of the camp or of Christianity? Alas, beyond all question, the truth compels us to admit...

Duplicate

Duplicate Post

All the modern translations are missing much of the Word of God. I think that should mean a lot to a Christian (Mat 4:4), but something is awry with many. Probably due to being "babes Christ" (1Co 3:1), and still a bit "carnal" (v 3); but they will definitely grow to maturity (Phl 2:13).

There are hundreds of altered passages, words and phrases that do not give the same meaning as the Traditional Text. A good example is "Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God" (Phl 2:6). Its language states that Christ did not consider it stealing from God...

Sorry, I could not post this week's article due to excessive material. Catch you next time!

That's ok! Also wanted you to know that the modern version omit much Scripture. Example: 1Jn 5:7 is entirely omitted. They say "For there are three that testify," and that's all. It is suppose to say, "For there are Three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and...

Hi, and appreciate you reply! What we are discussing is 2Sam 21:19, which mistakenly says "Elhanan killed Goliath" in most of the modern translations. God bless!

Hi Brother, good to see you check in! Yes the Minority Text (Sinaiticus, codex B; the Vaticanus, codex Aleph, many do not count the Alexandrinus because it's worse than the other two) laid purdu for 1500 years, because the Greek scribes would not use them for copying due to numerous errors, and...

I think we either have Bibles with missing Scripture, or we don't. Thus, one of the differing manuscript sources (only 2 primary sources--the Majority Text or the Minority Text) are grievously in error; and why not, Satan has to attack the written Word to attemt to get to the living Word.

Hi, and Amen! Where would an oppositional force against the Word of God come from? These false Bibles can't affect one's salvation, but only affect their growth in the Lord Jesus by not "living by every Word that proceedeth out from the mouth of God" (Mat 44). God bless!

I am just appealing to the fact that the Minority Text which the modern translations use are missing much of Scripture (Mat 4:4); and they change much of Scripture through interpolations (adding new words) and transpositions (changing the original order of the words).

Hi, and I agree. But the worst of all are the omissions, which without, one cannot grow as much (Mat 4:4).

"Wow," very convicting, and appreciate the support! God bless!