Search results

No they didn't and don't. "Amillennialism was the dominant view of the Protestant Reformers."

Complete ignorance. More errant shots from the lip. :laughing: No Reformer had ever heard of a pretrib rapture. It did not appear until more than two centuries after the Reformation. @Brakelite recognizes and understands the Reformation. You don't.

Not one of those is provably pretrib.

God has no qualms about transcending His OT temporal temple with a glorious NT edifice, His Church, being built by His Son since His First Coming. Matthew 16:18; Ephesians 2:19-22; Ephesians 5:27; 1 Peter 2:5 Remember that His Son is the mediator of a better covenant established upon better...

Daniel 9:27 was fulfilled more than 1900 years ago. The OT temple (sanctuary) was destroyed in 70 AD. Daniel 9:26. Yes, there is a temple in 2 Thessalonians 2:4. Just not your kind of temple. :laughing: The NT descriptions of the Temple of God as the believer in Christ, collectively His...

You espouse antichrist to be "a singular end times person". Ribera beat you to it more than 400 years ago. Dispens have fallen for it ever since they appeared in the 19th century. @Brakelite has ably answered your question.

Whom to believe? 1. @Douggg who espouses the "singular end times person" futurized fabrication of the apostate papacy's counter-Reformation Jesuit Francisco Ribera 2. The Reformers, whom God raised up and called into spiritual battle to liberate His True Church from the spiritual darkness and...

Paul didn't build Ezekiel's temple. Will he experience your "first Judgment"? :laughing: 1 Corinthians 3:16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? In Context | Full Chapter | Other Translations Greek 1 Corinthians 3:17 If any man defile the...

What of that has replacement theology replaced?

Example?

Which True Biblical theology? :laughing:

Which Biblical theology? :laughing: Why are you sorry? :laughing:

What has replacement theology replaced? Has it replaced Israel's physical DNA? No. Has it replaced Israel's opportunity to accept Christ and be saved? No. So what has replacement theology replaced?

Two Israels. Romans 9 6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the children of the flesh...

Daniel prophesied it. The Jews today confirm that it happened. No sign involved. You quoted them, so you agreed with them. But now you don't. Make up your mind. We can see who has no clue. :laughing:

Luke isn't Daniel. Stupid indeed.

What Scripture in Daniel refers to such a sign?

What beatings? :laughing: Point out the word "hyperbolically" in the following: "When the Romans razed the Second Temple, they left one outer wall standing. They probably would have destroyed that wall as well, but it must have seemed too insignificant to them since it was not part of the...

The Jews unambiguously refute that. Don't you believe your chosen people?

You should try telling these Jews that "its period of fulfillment is yet future". Tell us what they say. :laughing: Not to mention every other Jew throughout history who has accepted Christ and His New Covenant. Beginning with His own disciples. The claim that "its period of fulfillment is...