Search results

It obviously did not come from a desire to please God, on the part of Cain.

Hebrews 9:27 is a defense against the teaching of reincarnation.

Being RC is not a sin.

Conspiracy fact. The Vatican has always been a hotbed of conspiracy. The Jesuits are dedicated to wiping out Protestant Christianity and they say that they will murder those who oppose them--right in their Jesuit oath! They use overt and covert means to do so. There are elements in the Roman...

Not yet. Read Romans 11 from verse 11 right til the end. Verse 25b--->"I want you to understand this mystery, dear brothers and sisters, so that you will not feel proud about yourselves. Some of the people of Israel have hard hearts, but this will last only until the full number of Gentiles...

No. God still has a plan for Israel. See Romans 11 They will--see Zechariah from the tenth chapter on. In the Millennial Kingdom, they will abide by the Old Covenant as well as the New Covenant. Yes. True.

If you will note--in the first point I made, I said that the Church is the spiritual Temple of God, not the physical Temple of God (which was still standing at the time when Paul wrote those words in 1 Corinthians. Remember, Jesus said that His was a spiritual kingdom during His first...

Christian Reformed also do infant baptism--even though many of them don't believe in it. o_O

Wasn't exactly lying--she was his half-sister. I guess you could say that it was a lie of omission.

The Hebrew midwives were commended and rewarded for lying to Pharaoh in Exodus 1:15-22. It was then permissible, as now, to lie in order to save lives.

1) The spiritual Temple of God is the Body of Christ. Yes. But, as of the time of that New Testament writing, (1 Corinthians was written ca. 56 A.D.) there was still a physical Temple standing in Jerusalem (it wasn't destroyed til 70 A.D.). It is unlikely that the Jewish Apostle Paul thought...

I'm aware of Antiochus IV Epiphanes, but that was 400 years before the first advent of Christ and still doesn't resolve the problem of harmonizing Paul's assertion in 2 Thes. 2 that he, she, it, them will stand (future tense) in the Temple of God...

Sorry to disappoint you bbyrd, but I am very happily married. But thanks for the compliment (I think).

Why would they do that? Wouldn't that offend everyone who regards the TR as the true Bible?

Then who or what is the "little horn" who speaks great blasphemies against God? Who or what is the being (?) who stands in the Temple of God and announces that "he" is God?

I looked up 2 Thes. 2 in the TR online and it capitalizes Wicked (it also says "that" Wicked). 2 Thessalonians 2 - Textus Receptus

Doesn't it get old being an arrogant ignoramus, bbyrd? The End (after which comes the Eternal State) refers to an ending of the Law, since there is no more need for it. The Law was always meant for mortal man. LOL--you haven't laid a glove on me ever--your "iron scepter" amounts to a club...

It is quite unlikely that the Jewish apostle John would have named the specific tribes of Israel as meaning anything other than Israel. Now, having said that, you are correct in asserting that they would not have to come from the land of Israel BUT they would definitely be descendants of...

Yes--during the Millennial Kingdom, the law will be strictly enforced.

Applying terms like "bigots" to others does not and will not ever change the truth that God hates the depravity of humans. To be "proud" of what God has called an "abomination" is delusional as well as depraved.