Search results

You have no idea what you’re talking about.

If the baby was God, then Mary was God’s mother correct?

Wait, there are two words of God? Jesus is the word of God and the spoken word which created everything per Gen 1 is the word of God? Maybe God spoke through Jesus in Gen 1?

God was with God in the beginning? Or, the spoken word of God was with God in the beginning?

Was Mary, God’s mother, a sinner?

God was born of a woman? Was she sinless? Think of the implications of being the son of a sinner. Right, then Jesus had an Adamic side to his person. He could have sinned if he wanted to. Thank God that ”God” did not sin, huh?

Did you know that the first Adam was made in the likeness of the last Adam? Did you know that this is speaking of human form? Did you know that the image of God is human form? Did you know that the man Christ Jesus was there with God from the beginning? Did you know that the man Christ Jesus was...

Did God humble himself to the devil and wicked men per Philippians 2?

So you agree with me that the son of God originated as a sperm cell mated with an egg cell? Or, was he artificially inseminated as a fetus?

Post, Do you believe that all of God is inside Jesus? If not, how much of God is inside Jesus as Paul taught per Colossians 2:9?

The thing to admire is that I am willing to say that I was hooked in presupposition like you are. I shook the hook which you cannot. At least I can admit it. You are still a Roman Catholic type teaching, incarnationist.

Even when God was microscopic in the ovaries of Mary? Oh that’s right, you don’t like to think about that.

Adoption is not what we’re talking about. Jesus was not adopted. He was fully indwelled of all of what God consists of, bodily. You need to really try to understand Colossians 2:9, per Paul’s perspective. You are a Roman Catholic in your idea that God became Jesus.

I am a different kind of oneness. A first century kind. Before the RCC got involved. My kind of oneness teaches God inside the man Christ Jesus, unifying them as one. Neither oneness or trinity agree with this. I also teach Jesus was made God by default after his God raised him from the dead...

That is what it’s all about.

It is clear what you said but the Law was given to condemn. One must keep that in mind. Every part of the Law creates failure and the knowledge of sin. It cannot be sliced into segments. For instance, the OT tabernacle procession was the equivalent of obeying Acts 2:38 for us today. So is...

This is regarding Jesus’ future reign as per the prophets and Rev 20.... 6 When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel? 7 And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which...

No, I am saying the Holy Ghost is our teacher. Those that do not have the Holy Ghost need the Old Testament law to teach them. Did you know that the old testament is our school master. Are you still in school?

You still don’t get it, Peter said those days were there in Acts 2. He quoted the end. He said this is that which was spoke by Joel. What you are describing is the end of that era. Just like Peter was.

Any futurist that claims to be a futurist that says that there is no future earthly kingdom for Jesus to reign on planet earth is a preterist in disguise. They think written scripture means other than it is written. We will call you a pre partial Preterist.