Search results

Yes, which elaboration was added for the fathers of Israel who would recognize Him by that name. But first He said "I AM" when Moses ask what name.

I think we better drop it there...for you are off on a tangent of God not having a body, when it is written that "the Lord God walked in the garden in the cool of the day", the same God who created Heaven and Earth.

The need to be born again is not from me, but from Jesus. It is not that body born in the "image" of God, but that which is born of the "essence" of God.

Day follows night until the end.

I wasn't saying otherwise, but rather that: 1 Corinthians 15:44b There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.

That is a lie. Tell it to your father. What is this...three threads now that you are calling good evil and evil good? God is not mocked.

Here is your error and the evidence that you speak against the Spirit, making accusations of "spiritualizing" as if the very essence of God is bad: On the contrary, to speak against the very essence of God (being spirit) as you do...is against God. And for that reason you don't like me. Too...

Quoting you for the record.

You are relying on your own understanding--using the technicalities of what is written against the truth. What could be taken from the womb and live, but is taken and dies by the hand of those who take it--is murder, for they have denied it the breath of life from God.

It would appear that you do not know that the Spirit does not "misapply", but selects from what is written where it was not before known to apply. "Delusion" is rather that unknown that was before it was revealed. I have told you the truth.

Your criticisms against the fact that "It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing", are duly noted.

You have not "rightly divided" his words. Paul was born and lived much of his life before salvation came. He was a Jew of the old Israel, and on the cusp between "the dead in Christ" and "the living in Christ." The words he wrote, were a mix that needed to be "rightly divided", as he said: For...

This is the exchange between God and Moses: Then Moses said to God, “Indeed, when I come to the children of Israel and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they say to me, ‘What is His name?’ what shall I say to them?” 14 And God said to Moses, “I AM WHO I AM.” And He...

There are many errors of misunderstanding in that explanation. There is no process of maturity as you suggest, but rather, "in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye" we are changed. It is true that some (not all) are left in the world after they are saved, who do mature for greater service to...

I should think that it is because when asked who He was, answering with "I am", was a statement rather than an answer...that He is all that which is written of Him--and more.

Yes, clearly and literally--but rather as God is what is literal! But why do you then mock God to suggest that looking at what was spiritually inspired and given from God whom is spirit, should not be looked at as spiritual? And what is more "literal" than God whom is spirit? Is the world which...

The term "place" was spoken to men in worldly terms who "could not bear" anything more at the time. John 16:12 The kingdom of God was also referred to as a place ("above"), but clarified to be "within you." None of which seems to have impressed upon you that the words are rather spirit...and...

I am not sure what it is you are trying to say. It sounds like you are expecting that the flesh does in fact inherit the kingdom of God, and the creation was an act of God to evolve from spirit (which was already perfect) into us and Jesus and the Father all becoming One in a type of...

That explanation is not "rightly dividing the word of truth" between what is true of those who died before salvation came, and those who came after. Which, indeed, makes Israel "the dead in Christ" for having served but died in their sins. Nonetheless, it was for the house of Israel who Christ...