Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. M

    Proof of the Trinity. No takers?

    Meaningless because God is presented in both singular and plural. Only three times he's presented in the plural in the OT!
  2. M

    Proof of the Trinity. No takers?

    justbyfaith said, Non Trinitarians don't condemn Trinitarians. Trinitarians condemn those of us who reject the false teaching. Trinitarian's are the divisive ones. How many times do I have to post them? I know the typical trinitarian cop out of "That was because of his humanity." Trinity...
  3. M

    Proof of the Trinity. No takers?

    Your problem is you have no depth, no hermeneutic, no understand what the Trinity doctrine teaches, and you haven't bothered to answer even one of my questions. Good job.
  4. M

    Proof of the Trinity. No takers?

    Martin Luther, the German priest who initiated the Protestant Reformation, conceded, “It is indeed true that the name ‘Trinity’ is nowhere to be found in the Holy Scriptures, but has been conceived and invented by man” (reproduced in The Sermons of Martin Luther, John Lenker, editor, Vol. 3...
  5. M

    Proof of the Trinity. No takers?

    Cyril Richardson, professor of church history at New York’s Union Theological Seminary, though a dedicated Trinitarian himself, said this in his book The Doctrine of The Trinity: “My conclusion, then, about the doctrine of the Trinity is that it is an artificial construct . . . It produces...
  6. M

    Proof of the Trinity. No takers?

    Religious writer A.W. Tozer, in his book, The Knowledge of the Holy, states that the Trinity is an “incomprehensible mystery” and that attempts to understand it “must remain forever futile.” He admits that churches, “without pretending to understand,” have nevertheless continued to teach this...
  7. M

    Proof of the Trinity. No takers?

    Harvest said, I agree with that. However, I believe that POWER comes from the seven spirits of God which is likely seven different hierarchies of angels whose power is overseen and executed by archangels. That's the most logical way I can describe it anyway.
  8. M

    Proof of the Trinity. No takers?

    The "OH Dear", demanded questioning your discernment. As far as the word Godhead goes, it's used 3 times in the NT and translated as DIVINE, DIVINITY, or DEITY in the interlinear. None of those words imply a co-equal trio of God the Father. Take a look, Acts 17:29...
  9. M

    Proof of the Trinity. No takers?

    Either you don't understand the doctrine you are trying to support, or you refuse to understand it. Which is it?
  10. M

    Proof of the Trinity. No takers?

    Discernment, it can go a long way if people apply it.... "And now I am no more in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to thee. Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that they may be one, as we are."
  11. M

    Proof of the Trinity. No takers?

    I suppose you don't understand the analogy in the verse. So much for discernment... But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a wife is her husband, and the head of Christ is God.
  12. M

    Proof of the Trinity. No takers?

    I keep telling you that simply because the three are mentioned in no way implies a co-equal trinity! If you think it does then you need some serious assistance.
  13. M

    Proof of the Trinity. No takers?

    You've shown no depth whatsoever. I've been on debates over Trinity before and this is nothing. You don't back up anything you say, and you don't answer any of my questions. It's not an opinion it's a FACT! I do my best to answer all questions. And you?
  14. M

    Proof of the Trinity. No takers?

    Being ONE does not indicate they are co-equal. It simply implies they are of the same mind/spirit, purpose, and how they accomplish things. It means THEY ARE IN AGREEMENT. Just like when a husband and wife become ONE. But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the...
  15. M

    Proof of the Trinity. No takers?

    You have no depth.
  16. M

    Proof of the Trinity. No takers?

    Either you don't understand the Trinity doctrine or you're simply in denial. That proves absolutely NOTHING about a co-equal trinity. You provide empty words.
  17. M

    Proof of the Trinity. No takers?

    Sure. Sometime the word God is in the plural, sometimes in the singular. Strong's has a trinitarian slant to his pages and when doesn't expose it when it's SINGULAR. Take a look at the Textus Receptus on 1 Peter and go to verse 23 and look at the word God. It's in the singular...
  18. M

    Proof of the Trinity. No takers?

    That doesn't work. The holy spirit does far more than indwell believers on earth!
  19. M

    Proof of the Trinity. No takers?

    What material concepts are you referring to? I'm looking at Jesus' own words and at the text in the original text. You are providing nothing but empty words. You will never understand there is NO trinity believing teachings of others.
  20. M

    Proof of the Trinity. No takers?

    It's incomprehensible and most Trinitarians will tell you it cannot be understood! You haven't answered any of my questions. IF the holy spirit was ONE person equal to God and Jesus, he would have a name, and he would be found in or around the Throne of God. IF the Trinity was true, it would...