Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. TribulationSigns

    Time frames we have to work with

    Once again, to insist that the final week of Daniel 9:27 is 7 literal years long is a false doctrine of Premillennialism. And Mount Sinai is not the covenant of Daniel 9:27 with your fantasy king of Israel as "antichrist," "beast", "little horn" etc. Not going to happen like you believe.
  2. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Probably if you fail to compare Scripture with Scripture. So you are trying to compare our understanding of how a chain can do to a spirit called Satan with an inventor who invented electricity but does not know how it will evolve into something bigger in the future. How absurd! We, with...
  3. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Indeed, no chain or key will be able to bind a spirit. Therefore the chain and key both have spiritual significance that one needs to find out with the rest of Scripture.
  4. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Go ahead and have the same blindness as the Jews thinking Christ was talking about physical temple or physical buildings. You Preterists and Premillennialists have same blindness. That is okay. That is expected per Scripture. We were called or empowered at Pentecost to...
  5. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Not according to KJV. I am not interested in your modern translated Bible. The temple buildings were referred spiritually to His congregation. The same mind set of the faulty preterism doctrine. LOL, you can't have your cake and eat it too. According to the Word of God, there is only one...
  6. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Interestingly, your faulty bible translation lacks "pestilences" in verse 7. With Olivet Discourse, Christ prophesied to His New Testament Congregation of Israel, the Church. Not to the Jews in 70AD.
  7. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    You are missing the point. First I do believe in Christ's birth according to Scripture. Let me explain. I'm saying is that I believe that this is the only system that interprets directly by the text itself, and thus is an interpretation from God and not from man. It doesn't promote an...
  8. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Huh? What are you babbling about? I do not deny that Christ was born physically according to Scripture. But again what does this have to do with the "great buildings" and "stones' being discussed here?
  9. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Have you read the Scripture carefully? Mat 24:1-2 (1) And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple. (2) And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here...
  10. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    What source of secular history interpreted Scripture?
  11. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Like I said, the Lord Judges, and I am comfortable with that. In other words, God will judge our testimony. Especially when you falsely accused me of lying.
  12. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Like I said, the Lord Judges, and I am comfortable with that. Gal 4:16 (16) Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?
  13. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    But what does that have to do with the price of bananas with the fallen stones of the buildings?! The "secular history" of the Herod temple destroyed in 70AD was NOT what Christ had in mind when He prophesied about His own people (the husbandmen) who came and destroy him. Not Romans.
  14. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    I believe the one who has downplayed the Scripture I quoted regarding the stones is the one who is dishonest.
  15. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    You misunderstood. There were many Jews from surrounding regions and nations who visited Jersualem during Passover (when Christ died) and went back home after Pentecost with the Holy Ghost preaching Gospel before Paul even did. Christianity had already spread into regions after 33AD. Paul...
  16. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    No, I quoted the disputed Scripture you believed was physical when you have been corrected... many times. You do not receive the love of the truth.
  17. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    The Lord spoke of His People, His builders that the "great buildings" of the city and temple represents. They are Christ's congregation. Stones=People. The Lord did not talk about physical destruction of physical stones and building here. Mar 13:1-2 (1) And as he went out of the temple, one...
  18. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    I already quoted disputed Scripture with you many times here and on other threads. You are in denial that Olivet Discourse is about God's New Testament Congregation of Israel, the Church prior to Second Coming in the future. Not Israel with Jews in physical Judaea and destroyed temple in...