Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    As I said, it is because you lacks spiritual discernment thinking the Lord was talking about physical stones and buildings. But this is not what the Lord had in mind. But regardless... Gal 4:16 (16) Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth? The Lord judges and I am...
  2. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Was the temple or even the city physically rebuilt after three days in 70AD? Then that is not what the Lord talked about.
  3. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    You are funny. Christians have already gone into the surrounding nations after Pentecost. Even Saul has to pursue Christians in Damascus. Nothing to do with 70AD.
  4. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    If you are a fan of secular history, go look it up and find out how the city was repopulated and rebuilt. Think this is really what the Lord talked about or are you looking at the wrong place (as usual).
  5. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Yeah, like when Christ said they would come and destroy the temple and in three days Christ rebuilt it. And like you, they thought Christ was talking about the physical temple that took 46 years to build. Likewise, the disciples thought Christ was talking about the physical destruction of the...
  6. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Romans 9:8 "That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed." Something has already taken place where the Old Testament congregation has been brought to ruin. They have been thrown dowen and would...
  7. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    (contiune from previous post) By contrast, you seem to be saying that history, as found in secular history books, is an accurate way to interpret God's word. If that is what you believe, I would say that is an unsound system of interpretation. Assumption is the mother of errors. Secular...
  8. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Not only Temple buildings but the buildings of the WHOLE city per Luke 19. But it is understandable that you are insisting on the "Temple building only" to guard your false preterism doctrine. Regardless, the Lord is talking about His Old Testament congregation, the c children as stones...
  9. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    We can see remnants of this "even" after Pentecost as Peter was talking about requiring circumcision in the church, and his poor understanding of the lawfulness of eating unclean meats. We're talking about progressive Revelation here. The Disciples were still thinking in terms of Old Testament...
  10. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    You got the wrong Judaeans. God did not talk about people in physical Judaea. But that is okay since people like you are in denial that the kingdom representation was taken from Israel the moment Christ went to the Cross and was given to the Church in three days, John 2:18-21. In God's eyes...
  11. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    No you did not. I didn't quote Matthew 24 in my post. It was Luke 19:41-44. Do you agree that the Lord was talking about the whole city of Jersualem that her stones will fall? Yes or No. And then you quoted a different verse which has nothing to do with subject regarding stones: You are...
  12. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    I see that you avoid dealing with Scripture I quoted. Not surprised.
  13. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Actually Christ came for His congregation Israel, All Saints from the Old and New Testament out among the nation, including national Israel.
  14. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    What does the birth of Christ has to do anything with subject being discussed. Nothing. Perhaps you need to read my post and think carefully: And before you start rationalizing how those stones were not of the main Temple building like so many others, please pay careful attention that...
  15. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    True. That was when the Old Testament Israel fell with their stones (representing people/builders of the congregation) because the kingdom representative was taken from Israel and gave it others in three days (Church). Israel as a nation, no longer represents God's kingdom at the Cross.
  16. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Ahhh...there were "LOTS" of stones left standing, one upon another after 70 AD. And many still left standing one upon another 2000 years later. Thus 70 AD CANNOT rationally be the fulfillment of that particular prophesy "IF" it was meant of the Physical buildings of the Temple being thrown...
  17. TribulationSigns

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Wow. alot of blinds leading the blinds with their misinterpretations. Not getting any closer to the Truth. :watching and waiting:
  18. TribulationSigns

    Time frames we have to work with

    Ahem... I see alot of Speculations, misinterpretations, and misplacement of timelines. Sad.