Search results

That's your claim. God's OT nation was Israel. His NT nation is the Church. Nowhere in the NT is Israel any longer described as a nation. But the Church is: Matthew 21:43; 1 Peter 2:5,9 God did not have two nations in the OT, and He does not have two nations in the NT. When you refer to...

So your claim is that Israel replaces the Church. AKA replacement ideology/biology.

There is nothing that the Church replaces. It does not replace Israel's physical DNA. It does not replace Israel's opportunity to come to Christ. Thus, the claim of "replacement theology" is abject nonsense.

Did the Church replace Israel's physical DNA? Or did the Church replace Israel's opportunity to come to Christ? What did the Church replace?

So why is it called replacement theology?

What is replaced? Who or what replaces it?

You've already forgotten that I have no expectation of you coming to my view. I've provided Scripture confirming that it is the same Covenant. What Scripture can you provide confirming "That covenant is not the same covenant"?

Jesuit futurist eschatology is cowardice. :laughing:

Was the birth of Messiah a physical and spiritual event?

Yes, Matthew 26:28 is for only 1 week. :laughing: I see you're already flunking your English lesson. :laughing:

Daniel 9 27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many... Matthew 26 28 for this is my blood of the new covenant, that for many is being poured out -- to remission of sins; YLT Sounds like many doesn't include you. :laughing:

Daniel 9 27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many... Matthew 26 28 for this is my blood of the new covenant, that for many is being poured out -- to remission of sins; YLT The birth of Messiah was a physical and spiritual event. The ministry of Messiah was physical and spiritual events...

"The prince" is the grammatical referent of "He", and "Messiah the Prince" is the grammatical referent of "the prince", thus "He" is Messiah the Prince. At Calvary "He" confirmed the Covenant and caused sacrifice and oblation to cease; and in 70 AD He made Jerusalem desolate. Daniel 9:27 It's...

Referring to Jewish religion. Nothing to do with antisemitism.

Jews carry Babylonian talmudism. Its principles are the principles of antichrist.

I have no idea what you're babbling about. Neither do you. :laughing:

This is not a reason for you to come to my view. I have no such expectation. Rather, it is to help those who understand and appreciate grammatical, Scriptural, and historical evidence, to come to their own conclusion and decision. You're not one of those.

Luke 18 31 Then he took unto him the twelve, and said unto them, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things that are written by the prophets concerning the Son of man shall be accomplished. Messiah has some choice words and enlightenment for you. Luke 24 25 Then he said unto them, O fools...

Thanks for the guffaws. You haven't answered a single one of Spiritual Israelite's questions. What are you afraid of this time? :laughing:

Although Titus was a prince, it was the Roman armies serving as the people of Messiah the Prince, to accomplish His purposes of judgment and desolation (Luke 21:20) upon Jerusalem and Israel, who destroyed the city and sanctuary. (Daniel 9:26) Titus recognized it: "We have certainly had God...