Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Actually you're wrong. The referrer and the referent must agree in gender and number. The referrer "He" is masculine and singular. The word "people" is gender neutral and plural; it does not qualify as the referent. The word "prince" is masculine and singular; it matches the gender and...
  2. C

    Who is the AntiChrist? (Identifying Him)

    Are you saying that Bellarmine would disagree with what he himself said when applied to Isaiah 9:6? What would he say about Isaiah 9:6? He said "All the names..." Isaiah 9:6 enumerates five of them. Or do you think they're maybe numbers instead of names? Then why didn't Bellarmine say, "All...
  3. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    If you can disprove Matthew 15:24, please do so. Why are you such a coward about Genesis 3:15?
  4. C

    Who is the AntiChrist? (Identifying Him)

    Your dementia is getting progressively worse. I quoted a verbatim copy/paste of your translation of Bellarmine from your post. Who do you think I was quoting?
  5. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    If the righteousness in the verses I cited was not everlasting righteousness, when did it end?
  6. C

    Who is the AntiChrist? (Identifying Him)

    1 John 2:18 500 [e] antichristos ἀντίχριστος antichrist N-NMS 500 antíxristos (from 473 /antí, "opposite to, in place of" and 5547 /Xristós, "Christ") – properly, opposite to Christ; someone acting in place of (against) Christ; "Antichrist." Exactly what Bellarmine described. "All names...
  7. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Has everything to do with the first half of the fulfilled 70th week.
  8. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Matthew 15 24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Go back to bed. :laughing:
  9. C

    Who is the AntiChrist? (Identifying Him)

    There's nothing more stupid than claiming a difference which exists only in your imagination. Have your handlers approved? :laughing:
  10. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    That's why you don't see Christ. It's been here for 2,000 years, as Scripture declares. God's obviously a disappointment for you. He's not for me and multitudes of others who trust Him. I know that God has accomplished what He said He would.
  11. C

    Who is the AntiChrist? (Identifying Him)

    Yes, everyone agrees that you are the Bible. :laughing:
  12. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Romans 3:22 Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference: Romans 4:5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness. Romans 5:17 For if...
  13. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    You can protest the rules of grammar all you want. But you cannot change them. SI and I have explained repeatedly how the ministries of Messiah and His disciples during the 70th week were to Israel, but you reject it. Scripture is clear that the Israel that God will save, and that by grace...
  14. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Some people's hallucinations never stop. :laughing:
  15. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Your explanation of everything means nothing. :laughing: Do you believe that Genesis 3:15 is literal?
  16. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    That's what your decapitated orphaned futurized fantasized 70th week is about. Messiah the Prince's fulfilled 70th week 2,000 years ago was about immeasurably more than that.
  17. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    The Roman soldiers were pagans who believed in false deities. You got it.
  18. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    Your memory's as bad as your hermeneutics. :laughing: I said yesterday that those verses were literal. Meanwhile, you're too afraid to tackle Genesis 3:15.
  19. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    And when was the BibleGateway: Authorized King James Version written? Hint: Not 1611. :laughing:
  20. C

    Why are some interpreters not being honest with the text involving Daniel 9:27?

    The grammatical referent of the "He's" in verse 27 is "the prince" in verse 26, the referent of which is "Messiah the Prince" in verse 25. Daniel 9 is all about Messiah the Prince.